The Telegraph sees both Pearson's/Leicester's failure and Ref Moss's 'inexplicable' cardings: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/fo...igers-pay-after-Tom-Huddlestone-red-card.html Good report & pics in the Mail: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...afety-Tom-Huddlestone-sees-red-stalemate.html City failed to score, but Leicester just failed, for the Independent: http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...eicester-fail-to-take-advantage-10108416.html Good report in the Mirror - Brucey 'incensed' ; City fail to take their chances; bookings inexplicable: http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/match-reports/leicester-city-0-0-hull-city-5332114 The Yorkshire Post focuses on Brucey's response to the bookings: http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/spor...-sent-off-to-leave-bruce-seeing-red-1-7156561 Pearson comes off badly in the Guardian's report: http://www.theguardian.com/football...-pearson-swears-at-journalist-after-hull-draw The Express thinks things could have been a lot worse for Leicester - not only their failure to take advantage of Thud's dismissal, but that Jelly and Abel H could have put 'em in their grave: http://www.express.co.uk/sport/foot...ise-on-Huddlestone-s-dismissal-to-stay-bottom Similar report in the Star (who still use City's old badge!): http://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/football/430762/Leicester-0-Hull-0-report
