Not happy reading for City fans.... The Mirror describes us as 'insipid': http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/match-reports/hull-city-0-1-crystal-palace-2783528 For the Guardian, it's about Pulis and our banner: http://www.theguardian.com/football/2013/nov/23/hull-city-crystal-palace-premier-league The Telegraph - Pulis and our lack of vigour: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/fo...ull-City-0-Crystal-Palace-1-match-report.html For the Independent, it was clearly Pulis and Palace's day: http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...keith-millen-signs-off-on-a-high-8959470.html In the Yorkshire Post, Brucey praises Pulis as a good choice for Palace, but thinks that City - even though not at our best - didn;t deserve to lose: http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/spor...e-didn-t-deserve-to-lose-says-bruce-1-6263756 The Mail seems to think it's all about Crystal Pulis... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...-match-report-Barry-Bannan-scores-winner.html Not much in the Express: http://www.express.co.uk/sport/foot...e-1-Barry-Bannan-lifts-Crystal-Palace-spirits It's sister paper - the Star - has more to say. But it's mainly about Pulis: http://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/fo...Crystal-Palace-1-Eagles-give-Tony-Pulis-wings
I don't think we deserved to lose either - a draw would have been a fair result , but still a massive disappointment.
Cheers stan. Not good reading though. The Grauniad reckons we had 14 shots?? Kinell what do they class as a shot!!
