Well, the Carlisle was a game turned on its head we scored 4 we won and we had much less of the ball.. ...is that due to Taylor and JET... WE HAD 9 SHOTS v Crewe 6 4 SHOTS ON TARGET = 4 GOALS THATS 10 out of 10 v Crewe 1 BUT ONLY 2 CORNERS v Crewe 7 v Crewe we had most of the possession. I notice that changes to our squad often bring more negs than positives quite often.. now maybe we have suddenly got the blend we need???? and a more experienced midfielder will just calm the tempo a bit?
There was only a slight change v Carlisle. The formation itself was similar. Its hard to make a parallel as Carlisle opened the game right out, didn't sit deep and went quite direct at times. City first half were poor as a team. Second half as a team they were good, and had more possession.The finishing compared to the match at Vale was of a high standard. Oldham I would expect will be a totally different proposition.
'we won and we had much less of the ball.. ...is that due to Taylor and JET...' More likely that the home team HAS to come at us leaving space in their half. Most teams that come to AG now sit. However, Junior reckons Oldham will 'come after us'. We'll see.