http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/20009247 Lucky, lucky bastards. We had to make do with a well worn copy of Whitehouse when I was at school.
Kids don't have the skill to deal with porn? What skills would those be, then? All sounds a bit Savile, to me.
Will we now have lots of teachers skulking round pubs looking for the shifty little guys from the Far east who sell cut price DVDs for a living and when they get nicked turn round and say "it's not for me it's for year 6"?
nah, think it will work the other way easier to fulfill your urges, whereas when porn was hard to come by durin the thatcher years, the deviants were rife
Just a thought. With the internet riddled with porn, can we afford to turn a blind eye to it in our schools?
The Genie is out of the bottle. Back in the day you used to have to pass round a grubby copy of a scud mag and if you were able to get the pages unstuck you could see a bit of hair pie. Nowadays even the slowest ****** (ER) can get utter filth on their computer within seconds. No amount of parental control will stop it but it is up to parents to sit their kids down and explain that real life isn't like the internet and the kinds of thing they might see on the computer isn't a reflection of normal relationships. Give me a PC back when I was a perma-**** teenager and I'd have worn out the hard drive. Kids are only using modern technology to do what I used to with a battered copy of Mayfair. Not sure that it is up to teachers to do this but a lot of parents off-load their responsibilities onto schools and blame them when their kids turn out to be *****s and losers.
Schools in come cases give instruction in religion. Most are into sport. Obviously schools have enough on their plates as it is, but if something can be squeezed in, then why not? Teaching ethics maybe? Dunno.
Gambol admitting that David Murray removed his stumps and sucked him off without having to bend down.
