Thing is there isn’t really a way of reflecting that something is tongue in cheek via text on the internetGreg, the first post was tongue in cheek because people on here know I don't like Corbyn, it's my duty to say something. I know he's not going to be arrested more's the pity.
I used "historical" because there is plenty of stuff to research on the net already. God knows what he's been up to recently though. I've posted many examples in the past so please don't ask for a source or proof, I already have.
People like to turn a blind eye when it comes to Corbyn because backing a terrorist sympathiser can be a bit awkward so best to deny he ever was. And the excuse that he was paving the way to the peace process is complete BS.
Also the reference to The Sun and The Daily Mail has been used on here before to undermine or end a discussion when they are struggling with a credible argument. From what I've seen of your previous posts you are more than capable than to resort to the old "Daily Mail" tactic.
I am not going to ask for proof or sources - notice how I didn’t in the first response. I also have no intention of researching through post history. Who knows how long it could take
The comment about the DM and The Sun was not meant to shut down anything. Again i am not going to go through the history of this forum to learn that is how it is used. In this case I am just aware of the outright hate those publications have for the man with hatchet job after hatchet job whilst ignoring outright corruption and criminality from the Tories. That is why i brought them up
And it is fascinating that you mention they are used as a way to shut things down and then use them as an attempt to try and discredit me. Very interesting indeed. Perhaps you don’t spot the hypocrisy or just don’t care
And I don’t have any idea what historical posts of mine you could be referring to. Perhaps some of the covid ones where I was intentionally trying to point out how people on the anti side of many of the covid measures argue or respond to methods of argument (notably the “do your research” demand - which is intentionally why I didn’t go there)
