A fans view on the rabble at crewe- Parish 7 almost nothing to do but one good save. Shorey 6 better second half Flint 6 Williams 7 win a lot in the air Maloney 6 good first half forgot he was playing second Bryan 7 at least tried, looked dangerous Pack 5 can someone tell me what he is actually FOR? Reid 6 at least he tried Wagstaff 7 good first half went missing second half JET 3 shocking miss then just walked around until subbed off Baldock 4 lumped long balls not the way to go at least ran around a bit Taylor 7 linked play and won most headers we looked much more dangerous when he came on. Seems like that lot aint interested now that means SoD has lost em,or they clearly are ****.
Aaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrrggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhh they are mostly his ****ing purchases when will you understand that. If he's lost them after 13 games then maybe he's not the messiah you thought.
But RR how can such a brilliantly fantastic manager who will be taking us to the 'promised land' possibly have lost the players?
Lost the players? He hasn't. Big question over the star one, but the rest were trying . It lacked zest that's a confidence issue and hardly a suprise. Chance of the game in a poor game till the penalty was City's. The penalty. In a sport which is full of cheats don't get touch tight they will dive. Don't attempt to tackle as they all dive. Don't attempt to tackle or get tight when players are heading away from goal as they dive. Big question over the star one. Its become evident why he is at this level. If he is lucky enough to get a game Tuesday we and the coach should expect to see a a reaction. Well done Joe Bryan [Bristol born, born a red put the ball in the Gasheads net] didn't let the performance of the star one drag you down. Tuesday I can see how it could easily go the right way.
If he was that poor then take him out of the side Tuesday. I only see one result another loss i am loosing the belief in this five pillars malarky.
I said this on otib, brilliant how both academy players get a better description of their peformances than others, when In fact they were just as bad as the whole team..
Problem is all the focus was put on the Academy and everything else was forgotten........Wrong way around in my eyes......I did say that when Del was in charge, but I got slaughtered on here as usual!
If their performance level was on par with one individuals the team would have lost six and seven. Bryan did offer some threat, and kept at it. The performance level of the team as a whole was affected by a couple having real mares. Nil for both sides would have been fair enough. I would hope there is a quite word had tomorrow in the shell like of the odd one.
All the focus is not on the academy. The focus of the club is on reducing massive losses, expenditure was 120+% past income. That loss was increased by Derek McCinnes and is still affecting the way the club is run e.g highest wage earners are McCinnes signings. The academy running costs are exempt under FFP, wages are not. The academy has to be utilised to offset debt. City cannot buy their way out. The maths does not add up. A point constantly forgotten by money junkies is the club accounts. As a football business City are one of the worst performing in the UK. Most non FC businesses in the 2012 state would be wound up.
You keep raising this point over and over Cliftonville, and I have yet to see ANYONE disagree with you regarding the spending, so who are these "money junkies" you keep referring to? We are all aware the club needed to reduce its running costs. So how would you explain that with the 2nd highest wage bill in the league we are sat bottom of that league?
We are all aware the club needed to reduce its running costs. Might want to change ALL to ?? So how would you explain that with the 2nd highest wage bill in the league we are sat bottom of that league? Hard call but City's isn't the second highest wage bill.
Well when that question was asked to JL he didn't deny it, he danced around the question like a politician.
Sheffield Utd. Higher income, but horrific financial losses.. Peterbroughs expenditure on transfers this season will be higher than BCFC's due to revenue created by sales of players.
Sorry JL in disguise, we are talking wages here, not transfer outlays. Media report it, BCFC board don't deny it, evidence to me points towards that we DO have one of the highest wages in the league. Unless maybe you think perhaps Colchester? What about Shrewsbury? Stevenage even???
Seems logical that the Blades wages would be higher. Gates 18000 and losing all that money. Sure some wag would spot it on the accounts if they were burning it KLF style. Somebody there as crap at spending as BCFC are.
a comment at last...lol Cant exactly say I agree I think there was an onus put on the academy but it did take the eye off the championship performances............... all our players, not deemed good enough seem to be doing well in their chosen championship teams............................!
