Just watched this idiot and wonder what is happening to the working and lower income families in the UK under the tories, because they suffered under them last time too. According to Phillip Davies. People have kids to get benefit, I mean, the 3rd 4th kids, not the 1st. What it really means You have 4 kids, lose your job and can only claim benefit for 2 kids. Meanwhile, Tories spend the most on supporting the old, so to aid this they are targeting children to save what is actually chicken feed. ****ing Tories. Philip Davies then went on to condone paying fuel allowance to millionaire pensioners with one face and depriving children of basic needs with his other face. Pure fookin scumbag this guy.
A lot of Tories think it is unfair to take all benefits from someone earning 60K !? cos they aspire to earn more!? But take it from someone depending totally 100% on that income is cool if they've got over 2 kids. Don't have triplets dont lose your job, dont make mistakes. Welfare and Crime, election menu eh
Shame they won't put this much energy into collecting taxes from Vodafone, Starbucks and Philip Greens wife eh
Wonder if Fred Goodwin gets heating allowance. I remember when labour raised the tax on over100ks a few years back, the noise coming out of London city was deafening, it was a sure end to their reign, how dare they tax those that can afford it and benefit more from the tax they pay.
Sir Norman, a Torie lapdog. Certainly getting looked after by keeping the Thatcher estate out of it, certainly will have 0 financial worries for the rest of his life.
Well let's hope he has some worrying to do when he's bending over in the shower for the soap he's dropped
More benefit-bashing to divert attention from the expenses fiddlers who systematically got away with it. Housing benefit for your kids is wrong; claiming rent for a 2nd home on expenses to pay to another MP is okay. Someday somebody's going to end up on a Westminster roof with a sniper rifle. He tried to divert the issue of millionaire heating allowances onto a general right vs wrong, refusing to comment on an individual tax dodger like Starbucks. Of course if a benefit fiddler had fiddled 0.1% of Starbucks' tax dodge he'd be named and shamed across the board.
Benefits are messed up - when you can earn more money by having 4 kids and not working than getting a job and trying to pay your way then something isn't right.
