Prediction League Peeha Week 9 2016/2017

@Solid_Air 2 @Jurgen @Lucaaas @Zingy @Jürgenmeiʃter @Treble @Heed @Swarbs @Diego @mustyfrog @StanDMan @More Hope With Rafa @Penfold's Adviser @InBiscanWeTrust

Alright boys, welcome to week 9.

This week pitched who we thought were the most dirtiest strikers in the week. Te question was which striker would be on 2 yellows cards by now.

Overall there were 11 correct answers and 4 wrong ones... Onto the correct ones

Zlatan - Picked by 2. The big swede has managed to get himself booked 3 times

Deeney - Picked by 3. The busy bustling big unit of deeney has also been booked 3 times like the swede.

Diego Costa - No surprises here probably the most volatile player in the EPL has picked up 4 bookings and arguably should have been sent off twice. Players will be happy to know hes been picked by 6 people so was an obvious popular pick

The losers:

Carroll - The pony tailed porn star wannabe has been injured for most of the season so unlucky Swarbs

Long - Picked by diego Long has been surprisingly clean for such a busy striker.

Negredo - Rafa has gone for negredo who has 0 yellows

Harry Kane - Penfold must be fuming that he has been injured.

This week sees Jurgen catching up but still behind Jurgenmeister who must surely be regretting his costa choice

please log in to view this image

please log in to view this image

 

Week 10 = all good so far!

 

@Diego

 

My answer has played 0 minutes in the league so far this year

 

I have Adrian of West Ham. He's played 830 minutes

 

I hope Walker is not injured

 

What's the next question?

 

GW 10 Name a player that will have played all 90 minutes of every game

 

Do I get a bonus point for a player that has played 0 minutes all season?

 

You can have as many points as you want

 

Great I'll have none then

sorted.

 

For the first time in 7 weeks i've decided not to throw away any fantasy football points. Only the 1 transfer this week XD

 

I never ever do double transfers unless I literally have no players playing! Even then it's a risk as they need to score at least 5 points for it to be worth the change (then minus any points the other player would have for you as well).

Not it made my tranafer for weekend yet, will have a look this afternoon.

 

Well the way i see it, i agree, the incoming player needs to score 6 or more for it to be worth it. I only do it when i think they people they are replacing will only get 2. It means even though i take the hit, i have that new players for the next coming weeks so long term wise i will be better off and short term wise equal if said player gets 4 points more than the replacement

 

Anyone else go for Tom Heaton?

 

true - whenever we do extra transfers it is a risk. Better consolidate 2 weeks transfer or do wildcard.