http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...claims-saw-suited-men-running-red-planet.html I wasn't aware the Viking probes sent back video, only stills. Assuming she's not a crackpot, it was probably a practice run or training exercise. What do you think?
Someone called Rochelle just called Capital Radio and said she used to work at Greenwich and had just seen little green men on Clapham Common wearing 'I Love Jupiter' tee-shirts. What do you think?
A recent survey in America found that 1 in 25 people think the world is run by lizard people. 15% say the government or the media adds mind-controlling technology to TV broadcast signals. 15% think the medical industry and the pharmaceutical industry “invent” new diseases to make money. 5% believe that Paul McCartney actually died in 1966. 14% believe in Bigfoot. 14% say the CIA was instrumental in creating the crack cocaine epidemic in America’s inner cities in the 1980’s. 28% believe Saddam Hussein was involved in the 9/11 attacks. 28% believe secretive power elite with a globalist agenda is conspiring to eventually rule the world through an authoritarian world government, or New World Order. 21% say a UFO crashed in Roswell, NM in 1947 and the US government covered it up. 6% believe Osama bin Laden is still alive. It's a worry.
There are almost certainly secret projects going on that we don't know about, I have been watching some programs on 'aliens' and there was a mass sighting in Belgium of a UFO, they claimed on the program that it was potentially a top secret NASA spacecraft. I don't necessarily believe everyone that is on these programs but some of it can be convincing and if nothing else it is interesting. The thing about this is even if it was faked at the time they would want it out in the open, any perceived advantage over the Russians was a bonus (one of the reasons people say the moon landing was faked).
You're absolutely spot on, there are some nutters out there who will literally do anything to get their 5 minutes of fame. Which is a shame because it leads the line of social thinking towards ridicule to those who have something important to say. A lot of the programs I've seen on the subject are for entertainment value only, perhaps serving slightly to provoke trains of thought but mostly to propogate the same information, rehashed into a format for today's idiots. I mean, the Roswell crash thing has been done to death. It started out as a UFO, then it was a weather balloon. Then the guy who found it was made out to be mental. Then the existence of Area 51 itself was denied. Then the US government realised people could drive past it and phsyically see it, so they acknowledged it again. Then Bob Lazar came out and talked about S4, whose existence was also flat out denied. Then, using a pair of highend binochulars and a video camera, scaled the mountain behind it and videoed it. So they had to acknowledge that too. Plausible deniability is a cunning tool when used on susceptible people, but you'd have to be some kind of ****** to believe there isn't something we aren't being told. I mean it's not even that hard to look into it yourself. The problem is that it's such a stigma to believe in such a thing, so socially unacceptable that people just aren't interested in what you have to say because to do so would make them part of a tiny minority, a classification which many people fear. Another common misconception is that it's restricted to the US, that it's an American thing to encounter misdirection, deciet and lies from those who lead the country. Our government's hands are probably just as dirty, but nobody really asks enough questions to force the issue. I mean, we're now living in a country where multiculturism is becoming rife and most of the people I encounter want to "ship them back off to where they come from". How on Earth are we as a society expected to make the next step in cultural and scientific evolution if the people who make up such a society are backwards thinking morons who's sole concern is how they're being robbed of work by "Johnny Foreigners" because they can't be arsed to get up off their backsides and find a job. I think Russell Brand is a bit of a tit, but he's got the right idea. We should be trying to stir things up, we should be trying to force the issue and yet we don't. We call those who try to make a change "rioters" and "terrorists", "idealists" and "weirdos". We get given the best of a bad bunch to vote for and we settle because every year we get told "it'll be better in a decade". Well, the time is now and we're worse than ever, according to some people. As Ghandi once said, "be the change you want to see in the world.". I had a very close friend who worked out of RAF Fylingdales for three and a bit years and he was one of the soundest, intelligent and generous people I ever had the pleasure of meeting. He could never tell me much about his work, but on the rare occasion he did, there was often a mixture of excitement and sadness in his voice. Some of the things he told me were so beyond my expectations that I literally pestered him for days on end for him to expand but he never did. Sadly, he passed away last year at the not very old age of 37 of hypothermia, so I guess I'll never get to find out what it was he really knew, but it at least gave me hope that there might be things going on that I can't control, but might nonetheless shake society into taking action. Or maybe he was totally wrong and I should ignore everything he told me. A great shame that would be indeed.
that's bullshit tbh i deal with ****ing tonnes of americans.. they're no more wierd than ****s here...
how any nation can take the piss out of the americans is laughable.. the english. the most insecure nation in the world
I guess it's the "in" thing to blame our cousins over the pond for everything. I have had more experience than most, dealing with Americans. True, you get some backward thinking rednecks, but you also get that in any country. - Is it just a way to feel better about our own ****ty existance? "we live in a very heavily taxed society" "The government is playing Robin Hood, in reverse, steal from the poor and give to the rich" "motorists are taxed to **** and yet we see no improvements on the state of the roads" "the weather is ****" well at least were not americans. I know where I'd rather live. TX has a VAT rate of 8% most of US is under 10% we have 20% we're gonna lose the NHS soon. soon to be privatised. I have a way out, I'm ****ing off to TX in a year or so for good... it's you lot I feel sorry for.
The number of 'conspiracy' theories regarding the JFK assassination have been blown out of the water recently by an Australian Investigator and the ballistics expert (now deceased) at the time of the shooting. Oswald fired two shots both from a 16 degree angle. One was deflected (by a light stanchion) and hit the road and fragments from this hit Kennedy causing him to say "I've been hit"! This caused the bloke in the front (who copped the 'magic bullet') to turn round as the second shot was fired that went through Kennedy's neck, through the lung of the bloke in front and then through his left wrist and knee. By turning he had put his body into exactly the path of the second bullet. There was no 'magic bullet'. The second shot did not kill Kennedy. The third shot which came from a 'street level' shot (NOT 16 degrees) struck the President in the back of the head. The bullet (unlike Oswald's bullets) was one that exploded on impact shattering Kennedy's skull and spilling his brains out. This killed the President. The only rifle capable of firing that sort of bullet was sat on the floor of the Secret Service car directly behind the President and it was 'ready to go' (stated by the head of the Secret Service at the time. (This means that it was loaded and cocked but with the safety catch on). When the first shot rang out the agent bent down to pick up the rifle. As he did so he unlocked the safety catch and rose up as the second shot was fired. As he did so the car lurched forward causing him to be unbalanced. The rifle went off and the bullet went through the Presidents head. It was an accidental death. Read the book "Mortal Error" by the ballistics expert at the time. It explains why the Secret Service hushed it up. This is the most plausible explanation I have read. Oswald acted alone and so did Jack Ruby. There were no Mafia or Cuban conspiracies. The Secret Service withdrew the rifle in question (directly after the incident) and it was never used by them again.
It may be because of things like this. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...scorted-Airways-flight-passenger-reveals.html
Not exactly. There were problems with the official film of the Moon landing. Nobody knows whether this was because the quality was such that you couldn't tell what it was or (here the conspiracy theorists are having a ball) whether there were things on the film that were considered not for the public's eye. The film commonly seen was shot in Stanley Kubrik's studio with Kubrik himself taking control (he did a deal with the 'powers-that-be' but nobody knows exactly what - there are documentaries on this subject readily available) of some scenes. So yes, we did land on the Moon but most of the film was re-shot.
