Gonny start posting all scuddy n porn pics/GIFS in NSFW tags! Am gonny end up getting the tin tack! Q the predicatble boring ****s who'll post porn gifs n pics
Also, get the GC background changed. Pudsey bear's big heid makes it a bit obvious the site is not work related.
What are we classing as porn? Seeing as how someone has deleted a picture that only contained tits, less than you would see in some papers.
I'm not doing it to be a prick, we're starting to get noticed by people - Google banned ads for a month there and it took me absolutely ages to trawl through threads deleting images (almost all of them on General Chat), it also removed us from non-adult searches before killing any chance of getting new members, and now we're being threatened with a block on three major Mobile phone networks. ----------------------- Dear Mr Reid I am writing in connection with a complaint that has been received about a discussion thread on the not606 website, concerning rape. Just to give you a bit of background on the context. You will be no doubt be aware that there has been longstanding concern in the UK about how best to protect children from accessing age inappropriate content on the Internet. In response, the UKâs mobile operators have had in place a Code of Practice that seeks to addresses such concerns. It is set out here: http://www.mobilebroadbandgroup.com/documents/UKCodeofpractice_mobile_010713.pdf. One of commitments is to offer an Internet filter, whereby the content accessible by children can be modified. With large numbers of children now accessing the Internet on a mobile, this aspect is becoming increasingly important. I am responsible for overseeing the implementation of the Code. To underpin the code we have appointed an independent body to advise on what content is or is not age inappropriate for minors to view, so that we are in a position to filter a mobile operatorâs Internet access service accordingly. The independent body is also able to receive complaints from the public about content on websites and to make a determination as to whether it is age inappropriate. The role of the independent body is performed by the BBFC (explained here: http://www.bbfc.co.uk/what-classification/mobile-content. Complaint A member of the public has complained that a number of threads on not606 are adult in nature and should not be available for children. For the most part, the BBFC has not agreed but it has informed me that the thread titled Rape Gallery http://www.not606.com/group.php?discussionid=597&pp=10&page=2&do=discuss is age inappropriate, not for the content itself but its title. Before we consider what changes may be made on our side, I thought it worth notifying you of this complaint in case you wish to make changes on your side by removing or renaming the offending thread. This would avoid the risk that content on not606.com will become unavailable from a mobile. If you would like to discuss this in more detail, please get in touch. With regards, **** Chair Mobile Broadband Group www.mbg.mobi
I love the backdrop picture, but gotta concede that it is a castiron giveaway; on balance I still say leave it as it is, I'll take my chances
Any kids reading threads on here would be bored ****less by endless circular irish arguments before they reached any 'inappropriate content'.
**** cameron and his ****ing censorship pish. There will be none of this pish in an independent scotland.
