Interesting article. It's far from a cut and dry subject. Part of me wishes Di Canio would clarify his views, on the other hand he is hardly preaching them and ramming them down people's throats ( if anything it's the opposite). Why the **** should he when it has nothing to do with his job or with football? http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/8316271.stm He could do with some former colleagues and teammates piping up though to get people off his case!
Excellent article. I'm a socialist, as the leader of the unions are supposed to be. I would assume they are better educated than me, or should be to hold such lofty cushy positions. So how come they can't read up on a subject, before jumping on the rhetoric bandwagon espoused by the media?
It was two three down on the search results on Google - "what is the definition of fascism" Clearly "Googling" isn't in a journo's toolbox! Interesting read though!
do you know what pisses me off about the beeb? this : http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/19749668 Not long ago since he had his own column, none of this **** then
- I wouldn`t assume anything of the sort - the majority of them seem to be semi literate, self publicising to****s, just like their mates the politicians.
They did a whole feature/sales pitch on how he was ready for the Chamionship or Prem a week or so before he joined us bigging him up! ****ing clowns.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tonypandy_Riots Use of the army to enforce political stances? Is that fascism? Then what was Winston Churchill's motives in South Wales in 1910/11? You see its not just fascism, its true blue blooded heroic figures as well? You can finds and make up your mind on a plethora of historical events throughout the 20th century?
Careful, he mentions the words dictator; anarchy and democracy in this article and the press could make up a weeks worth of news based very loosely around those 3 words alone.
