Not a red and for VAR not to overturn it is shocking. What is the point in reviewing the footage if you are basically only there to overturn howlers?
Ref: "Looked dangerous, straight red for me" VAR: "Well, he didn't really touch him, but suppose it could have been dangerous if he had" Ref: "So, should I overturn it?" VAR: "Nah, why bother?"
switched on for the extra time and just about the first comment 'well, VAR is only there for clear and obvious errors though' and i just laughed, how 'clear and obvious' is a player who is 1mm offside? should have had a goal barnsley mind but after that save you could say the 3rd place has thier name on it.