To the few none-Arsenal f--kers complaining about the ref, how's this one for you, Walcott's clear equalising goal that passed the line, wasn't given, the goal was given thanks to Jenkinson who just played on and put it in the net with an actual good finnish. Basically, if Jenkinson wasn't there to finish it, we would've lost that one, NOW TALK ABOUT **** REFEREE DECISIONS YOU C-NTS.
Dont forget the last defender diving in front of our player and palming the ball away not being a penalty and red card. Assuming we had scored the penalty it would have been 4-2 with 35 minutes to go against 10 men. I think he thought he had pretty much guaranteed Reading the game with that one. But not to worry, it made it an even more cracking game in the end and Im enjoying Reading all of the reports today.
**** me....a game like that which will live in the memory for years to come and you still find something to moan about
The four minutes were signalled BEFORE Reading made their last substitution - at least one minute is added on, so Reading only have themselves to blame for that. In fairness, the ref tried to let the game flow, and thus both sides were not penaliased as much as in other games. Whatver the result, it was a great game to watch (unless you are Wenger and anyonme connected with Reading). Am I allowed to express a modicom of sympathy towards Reading or will that be construed as patronising?
Yes - I was just watching the replay and the referee appears to blow his whistle before Jenkinson puts it into the net.
I wonder if he's been back to the Madjedski to try and find that ball he dropped whilst he was being interviewed ?
