Seems the club were wrong to allow BCB staff not to wear SAFC colours. Also wrong to sanction provocative banners.
Also wrong to allow all the away support to sit above the South Stand SC holders who've had missiles thrown on them before.
If there'd been trouble the club would've had to explain all of that to the FA ...
... meanwhile at West Brom, 40 minutes disruption, mass arrests, spectators stewards and police injured, club sanctioned, etc etc etc.
But Sunderland betrayed the supporters and got everything wrong.
Are you saying the club handled the Derby game competently?
If so why did the owner issue an apology in his statement?

