A 22,000-word document has been halved to 12,000 words over the last 18 months. The new laws were approved by the International Football Association Board in London this week, will be ratified at the body's March meeting, and will be in force for the European Championship in June. David Elleray, who formulated the comprehensive revision of the laws, hopes rules will no longer be open to as much interpretation. "We are trying to help situations which tend to occur very often and are a bit crazy," said Elleray, a former English Premier League referee. "We have tried to use much clearer language. We tried to avoid a lot of unnecessary repetition and we tried to make it up-to-date. Because the laws have evolved piecemeal and no one has done a comprehensive review there have been inconsistencies." The Associated Press looks at the biggest revamp of the rules of soccer in 135 years by the IFAB, largely through Elleray's explanations: ___ KICKOFF The current law says the ball must go forward at kickoff and players have to be in their own half. The rule is being changed to allow the ball to go in any direction at kickoff — as long as it moves. PRE-MATCH RED CARDS Citing a row in the tunnel between Patrick Vieira and Roy Keane before an Arsenal-Manchester United match in 2005, Elleray highlighted how they could not have been sent off in the event of a full-scale fight. The laws were written at a time before it was custom for teams to line up next to each other in the tunnel before kickoff. In future, referees will be able to punish red-card offenses any time after the pre-match inspection. Elleray: "(Fighting players) would be banned from playing the match, but both teams would still start with 11 because they would be able to use one of the named substitutes. They would lose a substitute." LEAVING FIELD AFTER TREATMENT Elleray: "If a player is injured from a challenge which is punished by a red or yellow card, he can have quick treatment on the field of play and does not have to leave. It always seemed unfair that the victim team was down to 10 men and the guilty team has 11 against 10." QUICK RETURN Elleray: "If a player goes off to change his boots, at the moment he has to wait until the game is stopped and the referee has to go and check his boots before he can play again. Now we are saying his boots or whatever can be checked by the fourth official, the assistant referee even, and (the player can) come back during play." GRABBING OPPONENTS Elleray: "Two players go off the field of play. One tries to get back on to play the ball, and the other one grabs him off the field of play to stop him going back on. At the moment the referee gives a red or yellow card and restarts with a drop ball, which is clearly wrong. So we will be giving a free kick on the touchline or the goal-line. If it's inside the penalty area, it can be a penalty kick." BLOCKING GOALS Elleray: "If a (non-playing) substitute at the moment comes on and dives and stops the goal, it's an indirect free kick." And then there is the unlikely but not unforeseen situation in which a team physician comes onto the field during play. "If the doctor does it, it's a drop ball, which again is wrong for football. Their team benefits from breaking the law. So they will become direct free kicks or penalty kicks." PENALTY SHOOTOUTS Elleray: "If a player gets sent off during kicks from the penalty mark, the other team doesn't also go down to 10. So if it goes all the way through, the guilty team's best player takes a second kick against the innocent team's worst player." In future, both teams will be reduced to the same number of kickers. Elleray: "We are trying to make sure the laws are fair and support the team that has been offended against and don't reward people for breaking the laws of the game." OFFSIDE INCONSISTENCY Elleray: "Part of the law book says when players commit an offside offense, you give a free kick where the offense occurred. The other part of the law book says you give a free kick where the player was when he was in the offside position. So a player can actually move 20 yards from being in an offside position ... and it's only the moment he plays the ball that he is penalized. The law tells you to give the free kick in two different places. "So in future, the free kick will always be given where he commits the offside offense, even if he's in his own half, because you cannot be in an offside position in your own half, but you can go back into your own half to commit an offside offense." LOGO LOOPHOLE Club logos will be allowed on corner flags. Elleray: "It happens in the Premier League, but is actually against the laws of the game." COMMON SENSE Elleray: "We are encouraging referees to referee according to the spirit of the game and to use common sense. ... If you can play the game and there's a minor breach of the law, report it to the authorities and sort it out afterwards. Don't be too black and white in minor areas." That means, for example, in the grass-roots game, not abandoning a match if one of the four corner flags is broken. http://bigstory.ap.org/article/43ad...aws-overhauled-attempt-remove-inconsistencies
Elleray: "Two players go off the field of play. One tries to get back on to play the ball, and the other one grabs him off the field of play to stop him going back on. At the moment the referee gives a red or yellow card and restarts with a drop ball, which is clearly wrong. So we will be giving a free kick on the touchline or the goal-line. If it's inside the penalty area, it can be a penalty kick." Does that mean that in this instance the penalty area will effectively extend behind the goal, 44 yards wide for ever?
It's badly worded. What he means is that when a team reduced to 10 players takes their eleventh kick it would be in effect the 1st penalty taker against the oppositions 11th player. The 11th isn't necessarily the worst but perhaps the one feeling least confident of scoring.
I heard someone on radio saying they could be trialing video refs during the game in next year's FA cup games.
That makes even less sense. The first one would be a trusted penalty taker, against the team who weren't punisheds 11th, or, as he's commonly known "Oh ffs, we've run out of players, we have to let Chazz take one". Why would a teams first penalty taker be less confident?
They've missed the most obvious one for me. One that I can't understand why it doesn't get more attention and that's the triple punishment for 'denying a clear goalscoring opportunity'. I find it absurd that a defender can be deemed to have denied a goalscoring opportunity when he's given away a penalty. What's a better goalscoring opportunity than a penalty? It should only be a red card if it's outside the box (as a free kick is not sufficient compensation for a goalscoring opportunity whereas a penalty blatantly is) or if the ball is about to be tapped into an unguarded net or already on its way in or something, meaning the penalty actually isn't a fair compensation to the attacking team. It's ridiculous how a game can swing so heavily through a penalty and red card just over a single incident. Most of these rules just seem like silly things that will never be used.
The penalty shoot-out one is particularly rare. Have you EVER seen a shoot-out in which someone is sent off?
"KICKOFF The current law says the ball must go forward at kickoff and players have to be in their own half. The rule is being changed to allow the ball to go in any direction at kickoff — as long as it moves". More backpasses to the goalkeeper then?
The change to the kickoff rules means you could just have one player at the centre spot, passing it back. That's just gonna look wrong.
"If a player is injured from a challenge which is punished by a red or yellow card, he can have quick treatment on the field of play and does not have to leave. It always seemed unfair that the victim team was down to 10 men and the guilty team has 11 against 10." I know they do that in rugby but this change will be quite a shock in football.
Again, surely that's poorly written. I read it originally as if a player is sent off, when it comes to penalties that the team with 11 has to drop a player, but that does read as if someone gets sent off during pens. ****ing weird!
There's already a rule about both teams using 10 penalty takers each if there's a red card during the 120 minutes. This change is only in the event of a red card during the shoot-out, bringing it into line with the more normal circumstance.
It should mean the same number - although players may well feel more inclined to go down injured now, knowing they won't have to leave the field as a result.
