Chelsea have spent £65m (net) Liverpool have spent £69m (net) Arsenal have spent £86.3m (net) Manchester City have spent £113m (net) Manchester United have spent £184m (net) Thought Jose needed lots of cash to succeed (apart from at Inter, Unaio and Porto)
Yeah, gone are the days when yoonited fans could accuse other clubs of trying to buy the title, look how much they've spent to try and buy 4th.
To be fair Liverpool have spunked a **** load of money to repeatedly finish outside of the top 4. For all that investment you've only won one title. please log in to view this image
All good picking and choosing the year, I'm guessing every year since the Chelsea take over they are top until the City take over
Net Spend last 5 Years---------Purchased Gross--------Sold------------------Nett-------------Per Season 1---------Manchester City------£439,450,000------£147,400,000-------£292,050,000-------£58,410,000 2---------Chelsea---------------£471,609,000------£188,400,000-------£283,209,000-------£56,641,800 3---------Manchester United---£356,300,000------£73,600,000---------£282,700,000------£56,540,000 4---------Liverpool--------------£351,950,000------£216,020,000-------£135,930,000------£27,186,000 5---------Arsenal----------------£244,525,000------£160,300,000-------£84,225,000-------£16,845,000
Total spend since 2013 Manchester United----213.200.000 Chelsea ---------------197.209.000 Liverpool--------------165.800.000 Manchester City------154.700.000 Arsenal---------------124.500.000
Who gives a toss, United can afford it, whilst £££ty Chelski and the dippers are all in danger of breaching the FFP.
How are chelsea in danger of breaching FFP? Been in top seven revenue earners in europe since 99 http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deloitte_Football_Money_League And Jose a genius in the transfer market. He does not need to spend £200m to get top 4 like the Gaalacticos
