FA at it again - hyperactive against us.. more or less Dean is going to accept he missed and result 4 games for Nando!
Who gives a flying ****? Yes he should have. He wasn't. Doesn't justify Dean sending him off for what he actually did does it?
No maybe not..but affected the match wrongly just like you feel it did when he actually did get sent off.
**** knows what the op means but I take it's 4 game ban for nando? good, the judas face scratching fannyboy he is.
When assessing the ban, the dopes at the FA should remember Torres was wrongly given a second yellow by an incompetent referee. As a fan of retrospective video based punishment, I can't moan about the face scratching incident. 4 matches is wrong, and again shows the stupidity of the FA and their brain dead , unbending rules.
It's one of those where they've tied their hands so it will either be 4 or 1. It will only be 3 games for the scratching, if he gets done for it, but the extra one cannot be appealed(I don't believe) as it was 2 bookings and bookings can only be reversed in cases of mistaken identity. Barton had a kind of similar situation where the FA treated each incident seperately and banned him for each red card offence he committed against City. There can't really be any doubts about the violent conduct charge, should he receive it. Plenty of players have been given 3 match bans for leaning their head into another player, it's just unfortunate for Torres that it coincides with another ban that he can't appeal. Not sure how that shows corruption though.
3 games for the dumb scratching incident is fair enough, 4 just highlights the crazy situation the FA get themselves into because of their stupidity.
It's not really 4 though, it's 3+1. The automatic 1 match ban is incorrect but that's the way it's been for ages. Excuse me for having little sympathy for him
