Mouser Watch #2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hoddle is a god
  • Start date Start date
  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
So, guys... who do you think our next manager (a) will be, and (b) should be?
 
Sir_Red said:
McClaren....
You must log in or register to see images
Click to expand...

McClaren's actually an underrated manager. He's done some pretty impressive stuff, it's just that he's a bit of a pillock.
Won the Eredivisie with a club that wasn't Ajax, Feyenoord or PSV, took Boro to a European final and kept them in the top flight, yet West Ham fans thought that he wasn't good enough for them.
Should be swapping divisions with that lot at the end of the season though, if he keeps up his impressive run at Derby. Played ten, won eight, drawn one and lost one.

Wouldn't want him at WHL and he's just started a new job, but he's better than a lot of people out there.
 
chelsea - over 100 years of history said:
Check your facts. Suarez was bought in the same window as Torres who signed at the 11th hour for us. The idea was to play them together but he handed in a request and you replaced him with Carroll.
Click to expand...

Suarez signed after Torres was out of the helicopter at the bridge, it was a phone call from the ladyboy that persuaded Suarez to sign for us.
 
Page_Moss_Kopite said:
Suarez signed after Torres was out of the helicopter at the bridge, it was a phone call from the ladyboy that persuaded Suarez to sign for us.
Click to expand...

The deal was already done by then, regardless of ink to paper. He'd had his medical 2 days before deadline day. Liverpool only accepted our offer on deadline day. Fact is, the Torres sale contributed nothing to Suarez coming in. That money was spent primarily on Carroll. Surely you're not disputing that?
 
we sold you the biggest flop in pl history in arguably the biggest rip off the pl has ever seen.
 
chelsea - over 100 years of history said:
The deal was already done by then, regardless of ink to paper. He'd had his medical 2 days before deadline day. Liverpool only accepted our offer on deadline day. Fact is, the Torres sale contributed nothing to Suarez coming in. That money was spent primarily on Carroll. Surely you're not disputing that?
Click to expand...

Ink on paper makes it a legal and binding deal, as stated earlier the two players were never at the same club at the same time end of.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back