Suarez actions were ****ing ****ish, but genuine question, what was the outcome of this?
You must log in or register to see images
Sewerez had no chance of winning player of the year before today`s biting incident, as that surely belongs to our Gareth.
I would imagine fellow professionals would find it difficult to vote for a player that bites opponents, stamps on opponents, deliberately handles the ball, kicks people, intentionally tries to injure opponents, racially abuses opponents, dives at every given opportunity, over reacts and feigns injury (have I forgotten anything).
Still, I am pleased that this disgusting and vulgar individual stayed on the pitch to rob Cheatski of 2 points. Goofy deserves a lengthy ban, at least 8 - 10 games, but I hope that today was his final action for the Mousers and that he does everybody a favour and disappears out of English football forever.
The media furore over this incident is going to be unbearable. Does anyone actually think it's a big deal? We see players get away with near leg breaking challenges every week with no retrospective punishment, surely a far more serious issue...
Anyway, look at goofy's teeth... if he's got the tools he may as well use them.

Does seem a shame to see them go to waste, WY!!
However, as per comments in Rival thread, I do think that biting crosses a line of acceptability, regardless that the possible injury may be less significant (various potential infractions notwithstanding...). There is something extreme - animalistic - about biting that surpasses other assaults.
He just wanted a taste of Champions League football!