I'm sorry, but when you've spent over 108 million quid on players, yes, that's 108 million, and end up with jack **** and bland football, that makes you a major major major specialist in failure. So much for the great honeymoon return between Chelski and Mo, I thought it was hilarious how Chelski fans started booing at the end, already turning on Mo eh? FACT: Benitez the 'fat Spanish waiter' was more successful in his brief Chelski spell, than Mo's second reunion with Chelski. Jose Mourinho, we want you to stay.
They deserved **** all this season for the dour **** they have played. Hazard the only shining light and even he has his problems with the 'special' one.
Poor Hazard, wants to play for a football team, but gets stuck with that sack of ****, might as well have just gone to play for Stoke. Another great talented player that Chelski want to ruin, like many before, good thing is is that Hazard is that damn good Chelski won't be able to ruin him.
He never at any point claimed they were going to win anything this season though? Come on. I don't like Mourinho, but it reeks of desperation a bit to be trying to brand him a failure for not winning everything the first season in charge. Man City didn't win anything for a good few years after their cash injection either ... building squads takes time.
No, Maureen deserves to have the piss taken out of him for winning nothing, the guy brings it upon himself.
"You had one team that needed 3 points to have a chance to survive and they didn't play to win" -Mourinho What a twat "We had no chances of being champions" -Mourinho. As Wenger said he's afraid of failure. Easy to say you didn't fail if you pretend you didn't try At least Wenger admits we had a chance and we ****ed it up.
Oh please that's a load of cock, as Wenger rightly said, it's just a FEAR OF FAILURE. Mo never said they would win because he doesn't want to end up looking like a failure when they don't win nothing. When you spend 108 million pounds, and already have a very good squad, and you fail to win anything, that is FAILURE. Maybe you're living in some alternate reality where spending over 100 million pounds (more than any other team in England) and winning NOTHING is not seen as failure, but to the rest of the world, that is a massive cock up. And another thing, I can't recall any manager out there ever saying we're going to win, nobody ever says that, they say we're going for it, we have a chance for it etc, but no manager ever says (Keegan only comes to mind) saying WE WILL WIN IT, JUST WAIT AND SEE ****ERS.
Mo's comments after the game are gold: "It was quite a day. We had one team that needed three points to have a chance to survive - but didn't play to win and a team that needed a point to finish third and guarantee a Champions League group stage place that played to win. "During the first 45 minutes, our players were very slow. There was no intensity. In the second half it was different - the players wanted it much much more. "Norwich's gameplan surprised me. We were waiting for a crazy game, especially in the second half, where they would gamble everything, but it didn't happen. But we don't have a right to criticise." Haha, you can't make this **** up.
We must be in different realities yes, because in your one Chelsea had a "very good squad" before. Spending that amount and not winning anything in 2-3 years would be a big failure, yes. Were Man City failures in 2009 after spending about £100m on players? Not really ... you don't just throw cash at a team and then call it a failure if they don't win stuff immediately. If Mourinho doesn't win anything significant in the next 2-3 seasons, then he's a failure. As I said, trying so desperately to call him one now just makes you seem a bit sad, mate.
The difference is Maureen spent £100m to add to the other £100m's in recnet years so youre talking far, far more for the squad at that point. So yes, it is failure. I just looked it up and the value of the Chavski squad is £345m, how many other clubs could afford that? And Maureens comments about Wenger are lesson one on comments that can come back to haunt you.
His stint at Madrid was a massive failure too, with the resources-players he had, he was a massive let down, which is why they got rid of him, you won't find Madrid fans looking back fondly at the days of Mo or hoping he never left/comes back.
I think it's his arrogant twatishness that grates on most people, so that when he comes out with **** like accusing Wenger of being a 'specialist in failure' and then ****s it up himself, people have every right to take the piss out of him.
As i have said to the Chavs on their board , i have no particular gripe with Chelsea per se , but that Kant !! While he is there , they are shackled to a massive Turd . The stink will therefore attract the flies......lots of flies.
Neither's Van Persie, Vidic, Mata. Doesn't make the squad good. As I said, were Man City a failure for spending all that cash around 2008/09 and not getting immediately results? Or is it that squad-building takes time? Look, I don't like the guy either ... but come on. If we scrabble around desperately for anything we can get hold of now then it takes away from the pleasure of when he actually fails.
Sorry Murray but no one should need a reason to take the piss out of the class A kunt. "Specialist in failure" "19th century football". What a prick.
Chelsea's overall squad is much much much stronger than United's. Chelsea have a very solid strong defence, strong solid midfield, and very strong solid attacking midfielders, their striking department is average.
Yes, I agree with that, though i'd say they have am above average strike force, just the way Maureen sets them up (along with EVERY other team he has ever managed - one trick pony) stifles them. If Chelsea want to win things again, they need to get rid of Maureen. Let's hope they do just that, and he pisses back off to China or wherever it is he is from.
