1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Money still available in gills budget

Discussion in 'Gillingham' started by gills4everandaday, Jul 9, 2011.

  1. gills4everandaday

    gills4everandaday Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2011
    Messages:
    1,026
    Likes Received:
    10
    just listened to radio kent, to which p scally said...money is still available for a couple of players to bring in before the season starts. he also said that players who are not playing will have to go out on loan or be sold...due to the limit being reached!

    players which will fall in to that bracket; jackman we now know, richards, fuller, essam, davies, brunt, rance, evans, spiller, oli, s payne, hawkes if we get another keeper and rooney...who i hope breaks through this season for us!!
     
    #1
  2. brb

    brb Guest

    Slightly confused with those comments?

    Regardless though, is everything riding on us gaining promotion this season, in return for all this cost?
     
    #2
  3. MikeGills32

    MikeGills32 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2011
    Messages:
    318
    Likes Received:
    7
    oxon fuller and spiller wont be loaned out. they will probably start
     
    #3
  4. gills4everandaday

    gills4everandaday Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2011
    Messages:
    1,026
    Likes Received:
    10
    brb, confused about what.? we still have money to bring in a couple of better quility players that hessy feels he will need. although because we will be at the top end of the budget, players who are not playing regular football...will have to move on or out on loan to balance the books!


    mikegill32, they very well could begin the season for us as you say, but if last season is anything to go by...they will be hit and miss, hence better players coming in! just throwing some names out there, not certain departures! although i do see matt fish displacing barry fuller!! along with jack evans coming through as well in that position.
     
    #4
  5. brb

    brb Guest

    That's clearer, for some reason not quite how I read it originally. <ok>
     
    #5

Share This Page