I find this slightly homophobic and sexist. In the good name of equality, if this is to continue, there should also be a picture of a man to appease all appetites.
I don't think Charlie would be happy with that as any picture of an erection has to be no more upright than the Mull of Kintyre in order not to be regarded as hard porn (legal precedent).
I wish to complain; I saw the NSFW warning, so waited until I got home, expecting some tasteful artistic poses, only to find no tetas, no concha, nada. PS What is "Countdwon"?
Someone telling someone else to grow up on a thread for people to look at pictures of females like a bunch of sniggering adolescents. The irony!
Castro, just because some peoples bits and bobs still work properly, and they still find reasons to use them, no need to be so bitter about it.
Some of use our bits and bobs in interaction with real females not five finger shuffles, though 3 finger shuffles would be enough for most of them over pictures.
Sorry to disappoint you Princess but I haven't seen the picture. I came on here to see if there were any comments about either this was not allowed now, or, to see who was moaning they couldn't see nipples or something. As it was there was just the purile snidey comment at Charlie so I commented on that. For all your other faults, I never had you down as someone who would defend that.
You wish! I appreciate you're more than capable of looking after yourself, however, moronic comments like that which are generally excused as "banter" irritate me.
