1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Maybe UEFA are serious about FFP?

Discussion in 'Liverpool' started by Bozz, Sep 11, 2012.

  1. Bozz

    Bozz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    3,000
    Likes Received:
    36
    http://www.uefa.com/uefa/footballfi...ewsid=1857626.html#prize money clubs withheld

    please log in to view this image


    The UEFA Club Financial Control Body's (CFCB) investigatory chamber, chaired by former Belgian Prime Minister Jean-Luc Dehaene, has today announced that 23 clubs involved in 2012/13 UEFA club competitions have seen the payment of their prize money temporarily withheld pending further investigation.

    As part of the first measure of the financial fair play requirements included in the UEFA Club Licensing and Financial Fair Play Regulations 2012, the clubs participating in 2012/13 UEFA club competitions had to provide information regarding the status of any overdue payables as at 30 June 2012. Following its last meeting in August 2012, the CFCB investigatory chamber has identified that important overdue payables towards other clubs, and/or towards employees or social/tax authorities existed in 23 cases.

    These cases involve the following 23 clubs:
    FK Borac Banja Luka (BIH)
    FK Sarajevo (BIH)
    FK Željezničar (BIH)
    PFC CSKA Sofia (BUL)
    HNK Hajduk Split (CRO)
    NK Osijek (CRO)
    Club Atlético de Madrid (ESP)
    Málaga CF (ESP)
    Maccabi Netanya FC (ISR)
    FK Shkendija 79 (MKD)
    Floriana FC (MLT)
    FK Budućnost Podgorica (MNE)
    FK Rudar Pjevlja (MNE)
    Ruch Chorzów (POL)
    Sporting Clube de Portugal (POR)
    FC Dinamo Bucureşti (ROU)
    FC Rapid Bucureşti (ROU)
    FC Vaslui (ROU)
    FC Rubin Kazan (RUS)
    FK Partizan (SRB)
    FK Vojvodina (SRB)
    Eskişehirspor (TUR)
    Fenerbahçe SK (TUR)

    Consequently, the CFCB investigatory chamber will continue their investigations and request these clubs to provide an updated situation as of 30 September 2012 with regards to overdue payables towards other clubs, employees and social/tax authorities.

    This conservatory measure will remain into force until all identified balances have been settled in full or until a final decision by the CFCB adjudicatory chamber is taken.
     
    #1
  2. Why aren't Chelsea and/or Man City on there then...?
     
    #2
  3. KingEric07.

    KingEric07. cape wearing twat

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2011
    Messages:
    8,788
    Likes Received:
    205
    It's to do with being behind in payments to other clubs for payment of players or behind in payment of staff related payments currently <ok>
     
    #3
  4. Fair enough, only scanned the club names <ok>
     
    #4
  5. The artist JerryChristmas

    The artist JerryChristmas "Massive old member"

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2011
    Messages:
    14,503
    Likes Received:
    1,686
    I think we have to see how seriously they take it long term and how adept certain big spenders are at "bending" the rules/finding loopholes <ok> no surprise to see Malaga in there.
     
    #5
  6. Malaga, Porto, Fenerbahçe and A.Madrid are about the biggest names in the list, can't see UEFA being too fussed about punishing those sort of sides if they have to. Wait until a Liverpool, Man Utd, Barcelona, Real Madrid, Bayern Munich, Milan or Juventus etc pops up, then we'll see what the intentions are <ok>
     
    #6

  7. Flappy Flanagan (JK)

    Flappy Flanagan (JK) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2011
    Messages:
    13,224
    Likes Received:
    456
    Good to see no English clubs on there.
     
    #7
  8. UIR - Kagawa Powa

    UIR - Kagawa Powa New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    12,080
    Likes Received:
    95
    Porto are a big club, recent winners of quite a bit in europe as are A.madrid.
     
    #8
  9. True, but they are not a Real Madrid or Barcelona etc are they? Would you rather watch Porto or Juventus, ,Milan, Bayern, etc...? I reckon Man City will be a bigger pull than them too.
     
    #9
  10. Sir_Red

    Sir_Red Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    9,326
    Likes Received:
    687
    Until they punish City for their Etihad deal for two reasons: one for it being Sheiks cousin (conflict) and the other for it being well above market value (£400m <laugh>) then I will consider UEFA and their FFP a joke
     
    #10
  11. BringBackfootie

    BringBackfootie New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2011
    Messages:
    6,018
    Likes Received:
    52
    totally smacks of keeping small clubs small. Milan can be convicted of corruption and still play in the Cl and keep their money.

    None of the big boys in the list and they are the dirtiest clubs of all <doh>
     
    #11
  12. The artist JerryChristmas

    The artist JerryChristmas "Massive old member"

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2011
    Messages:
    14,503
    Likes Received:
    1,686
    Not that I'm cynical about Platini but I wonder how quick they'll be to punish PSG for any irregularities <whistle>
     
    #12
  13. UIR - Kagawa Powa

    UIR - Kagawa Powa New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    12,080
    Likes Received:
    95
    Rather watch Ath.Madrid and Porto over Milan tbh these days.
     
    #13
  14. BringBackfootie

    BringBackfootie New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2011
    Messages:
    6,018
    Likes Received:
    52
    Platini gave us a taste of UEFA justice with his beloved France in the last WC qualifiers.
     
    #14
  15. BringBackfootie

    BringBackfootie New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2011
    Messages:
    6,018
    Likes Received:
    52
    <laugh>

    Lots of rich owners means in the end UEFA will lose control. This is a system to prevent upsetting the status quo, it has nothing to do with fair play.
     
    #15
  16. Would that be the case for the majority...? I doubt it. Personally, I'm not that keen on watching non-English football so I probably wouldn't watch either <ok>
     
    #16
  17. Now that one will let the true colours shine through.
     
    #17
  18. One of the lads

    One of the lads Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2012
    Messages:
    4,904
    Likes Received:
    164
    so it's to do with payments then?
     
    #18
  19. Sir Kenny Dalglish

    Sir Kenny Dalglish Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2012
    Messages:
    1,615
    Likes Received:
    39
    Manchester City should be on it, but not for the sponsorship deal. They should be on it for paying more in wages than they earn annually as there is a huge short-fall.
     
    #19
  20. UIR - Kagawa Powa

    UIR - Kagawa Powa New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    12,080
    Likes Received:
    95
    I think the reason City are not on here along with PSG is because while they are bankrolled to the nines they are paying their staff and other clubs.

    Maybe Uefa are going through each bit at a a time. Starting with clubs who dont pay who they owe.
     
    #20

Share This Page