BMJ has stated that Mark Hughes has no ambition because he resigned from Fulham. http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/s...n-jol-lashes-out-at-qpr's-mark-hughes?cc=3436 A lot of pundits and football observers say that he is a very good manager and the players say they like him, but why doesn't he stay in a job very long? Is it that he isn't as good as people say or maybe he hasn't found the right club to showcase his talents. Thoughts?
When he have a weasel like Joorabchin whispering in his ear all the time, you can but wonder that his choices have been "unusual." Look at the other client he advises!
Seem to recall some years ago many said that many of the United players from that era could be capable of managing them when Fergie retired. As yet I cannot think of any of them who have shown the management skills necessary to run a big club.
Can't really judge Hughes on his City signings though, as it's impossible to know which were his. Not sure he even knew about some of them, til the press announced them. He doesn't seem to have learned anything from his time at City, either. He felt hard done by and harshly treated by them, so he goes to another club run by an eccentric rich bloke and now he's doing it again. Did very well with Blackburn and Wales though, to be fair.
