Madness

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

alwaysright

@ Very Angry Camel
Jul 4, 2011
9,404
2,848
113
Domus Clamantium
A definition of madness is repeating the wrong action and expecting a different outcome.........Somebody should try telling Ainsworth !

Picture the scene : Your team is defending a throw-in ( from a distance roughly level with the extent of the penalty area )-- or - your team is defending a corner....
Your team defends both scenarios by deploying all the players well inside your penalty area..... You do not leave anyone 'upfront.' You do not have an 'outlet.'

The opposition attack both situations with at least 9 players inside your penalty area...A 10th player is on the inner edge of your half of the centre circle... The opposition goalkeeper is 'sweeping' in the middle of his half of the pitch.

The ball is then 'played' by the opposition... It finds its' way into the middle of your penalty area - where one of your defenders manages to intercept it (( usually with minimal 'control' .)) The ball is then 'hoofed' upfield -- and invariably goes to the 10th opponent ( as aforesaid ), who has the luxury of not having any of your team near him.

Question : Guess where the ball is going next ((( and every bloody time ))) this plays out ?..... Can somebody please tell Ainsworth - he seems to be too busy with proving the 'rule' of madness.
 
I would always have a player upfield. With Rowe in team has to be him. He has more pace so could either hold ball or run with it. If not playing then leave Dack up there
 
  • Like
Reactions: brb and alwaysright