It wont be the first time I have been to a lUST meeting. I still hope that in this so called democratic organisation the views of all are considered. Failing that a vote of no confidence in the executive seems the logical thing given all the false dawns Gary and his cronies have given to the desperate members. It seems from my facebook account that there are a number of lustys who feel this way.
I should be easy to spot if anyone wants to grab me. Fat gobby Jock with white hair & probably wearing a bright yellow Partick Thistle t-shirt. May also be found out the back fighting with someone .....
As I understand it a number of members have produced a time line of false dawn statements and tv and radio appearences by you know who and intend to ask exactly what happened, why lust got it so wrong on so many occasions and why those responsible are still runninng the show. On top of that questioins need asking about the wisdom of getting into bed with a mysterious organisation that are intent on buying our club with pretend money.
Out of interest, why do you keep saying this? I'm pretty sure the first time you brought it up about 10 people explained to you reasons why your incorrect. Have you read David Haigh's interviews or even thought that Bates won't sell to someone with no money. These are really the only two people who are truly in the know and you seem to be siding with newspapers that are just trying to come up with anything to sell or get people viewing there website and actually don't know anything. Are you able to give me any sort of evidence this is true, would be appreciated, cheers
I'd be delighted to accept one, old chap! I've never refused the offer of a bottle of vintage champagne in my life!
