1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Lukaku vs Ba

Discussion in 'Chelsea' started by StanDMan, Jan 1, 2013.

  1. StanDMan

    StanDMan Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    7,567
    Likes Received:
    646
    Thought this is much needed now..


    Lukaku has everything Ba can & will offer and some..

    Lukaku has electric pace - Da has nothing on him
    Lukaku is free - Da has a release clause and some..
    Lukaku is younger and very well could be our future Drog!!
     
    #1
  2. No Kane No Gain

    No Kane No Gain Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2011
    Messages:
    20,582
    Likes Received:
    3,483
    Ba is without doubt a much better goalscorer and player. You've already spent all that money on Lukaku though so unless Torres is definitely going to be shipped off in the summer and Lukaku gets to compete with Ba for the starting spot then I'd not sign another striker and bring back Lukaku.
     
    #2
  3. Varier2

    Varier2 Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    2,109
    Likes Received:
    37
    Ba is £7m for a short term solution. Lukaku does not want to come back to be second man to Torres. I think Ba is a good move, especially if we mug Liverpool for Sturridge.
     
    #3
  4. bluemoon2

    bluemoon2 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2011
    Messages:
    4,677
    Likes Received:
    105
    I'm surprised we haven't called him back in the January window! With the FA cup ,Europa cup and Capital One cup all about to start, he'd be certain to get a fair few games!
     
    #4
  5. Drogs

    Drogs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2011
    Messages:
    17,870
    Likes Received:
    356
    Ba is twice as good and we'll profit from the sturridge deal. no brainer for me.
     
    #5

Share This Page