1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Long & Heskey

Discussion in 'Leicester City' started by THE FOXES 1884, Aug 3, 2011.

  1. THE FOXES 1884

    THE FOXES 1884 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    4,593
    Likes Received:
    185
    According to the verious papers & web sites we are putting in a 7.5 million quid bid for Shane Long & SGE asked EH to join LC & he said maybe next season.

    7.5 for Shane Long ? top player & a 20+ goal man if I´ve ever saw 1. Rather him than Maynard imo

    "COME ON LEICESTER, COME ON LEICESTER"

    :emoticon-0110-tongu
     
    #1
  2. sxfox

    sxfox Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    186
    Likes Received:
    0
    ....but 7.5 mill?????? couldn't we get a proven premiership striker for that, Robbie Kean, etc..???
     
    #2
  3. AKCJ

    AKCJ Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    21,874
    Likes Received:
    2,934
    I personally think Long is the new Kevin Doyle.

    I reckon thats a bargain for 7m for a goalscorer and hardworker.

    Get 'im Svennis <ok>
     
    #3
  4. Proud Fox

    Proud Fox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    24,239
    Likes Received:
    1,496
    I would prefer Maynard to Long as I think Maynard as a little more magic and the unpredicability factor about him. Lets sign Long now and try and pick Maynard up in January for peanuts. Shane Long is hardworking and scores goals, last season it was his best season but I still think 7M+ is too much but thats the position we are in now. I wouldnt mind us taking Jimmy Kebe aswell, that way we would of stripped another strong team of their 3 best players. Mills, Kebe and Long
     
    #4
  5. AKCJ

    AKCJ Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    21,874
    Likes Received:
    2,934
    Take Long and Kebe for 9m?

    6m for Long, 3m for Kebe?
     
    #5
  6. Champions of England

    Champions of England Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    769
    Likes Received:
    25
    I really hope we don't sign him for that kind of money, it's ridiculous and there is no way he is worth that. He's had ONE good season scoring 23 in the league but before that since 2005 he only scored 21 in total.

    How does scoring 44 goals in 5 seasons make him worth £7m, get real!!

    If we're prepared to spend that much why not throw it at BCFC, there is no way they'd turn that down!!
     
    #6
  7. Pull Your Fox Up

    Pull Your Fox Up Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    1,000
    Likes Received:
    21
    Because if we pay BCFC the ridiculous valuation of £5.5M + then it sends out two big messages:

    1) That if clubs hold on long enough then we will just cave in to there requests
    2) Every club can inflate the valuations of their players when doing business with us.

    The thing about Shlong is that Reading have always valued him at around £8M which is why WH made a close bid. If we had our £7.5M bid accepted then we are paying no more than what the football market believes he is worth. I didn&#8217;t see any of CCC wanting to pay £5.5M+ for Maynard
     
    #7
  8. AKCJ

    AKCJ Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    21,874
    Likes Received:
    2,934
    Because nobody can afford them in this league.
     
    #8
  9. Proud Fox

    Proud Fox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    24,239
    Likes Received:
    1,496

    Right Maynard wont sign a new deal, Bristol will sell him if he dont, we are the only team interested.

    Prem teams think he cost to much to gamble on him and other championship sides cant afford him
     
    #9
  10. Champions of England

    Champions of England Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    769
    Likes Received:
    25
    If we're prepared to spend that much though why didn't we just offer more than £5.5m to BCFC to start with rather than going through all this waiting, will he won't he bollocks.

    I agree that £5.5m is a ridiculous valuation but it's not as ridiculous as £8.5m for Long, who before this season did fvck all, in 4 seasons!!
     
    #10

  11. Proud Fox

    Proud Fox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    24,239
    Likes Received:
    1,496
    Right as we getting close to the season starting today i would offer Bristol 6M and Reading 7.5M and say they have until the end of the day to decide on them offer or we will withdraw both the offers and our interest
     
    #11
  12. Lesta4eva

    Lesta4eva Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2011
    Messages:
    393
    Likes Received:
    4
    I agree with arrofox. Why are we paying 7.5 mil on long when we can get maynard cheaper?
    Either signing upfront is ofcorse a big step
     
    #12
  13. leicester_ed

    leicester_ed Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2011
    Messages:
    6,786
    Likes Received:
    286
    id rather have Maynard for sure, but longs alright i guess.
     
    #13
  14. Pull Your Fox Up

    Pull Your Fox Up Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    1,000
    Likes Received:
    21
    Dont forget that Maynard still has the injury doubt - £5.5M is a huge gamble!
     
    #14
  15. Barwellfox

    Barwellfox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,814
    Likes Received:
    413
    Reading manager said ''When asked about Eriksson&#8217;s interest in the 24-year-old, he replied: &#8220;They&#8217;re interested in every player, so there&#8217;s no news there.&#8221;

    made me chuckle
     
    #15
  16. Proud Fox

    Proud Fox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    24,239
    Likes Received:
    1,496
    If we do offer 5.5M for Maynard and it does get accepted he will have to go through a medical and if they didnt think his body was up to it we will just pull the plug or try and get the price reduced.
     
    #16
  17. Greatness_Since_1884

    Greatness_Since_1884 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2011
    Messages:
    1,264
    Likes Received:
    3
    The thing with these price tags is that they're all relative to performance. It's all well and good saying he's overpriced and we shouldn't go near him but if Long scores the goals that get us promotion and £90 million+ then it'll be £7 million well spent. So it comes down to whether it's worth the gamble and I'd say yes we should go for him and take that risk because another striker is needed in my opinion and this is one who's proven to score at Championship level.

    And for those who say he's had one good season only, well Maynard has only scored 20+ goals once in the Championship as well and in both their 'big' seasons, Long scored more than Maynard. As for Sven not going back in for Maynard, maybe Sven rates Long higher but only went for Maynard first because he would have been cheaper but now thinks it's worth spending the extra money to get the better player?
     
    #17
  18. Lord_Dyer

    Lord_Dyer Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    1,668
    Likes Received:
    0
    Agreed

    Maynard, Long and Jerome, all 24y/old all ready to now prove they can walk the walk after doing reasonably well in the younger years, this should be the big move for each of them? they will sign a contract which will effectivly take them into their peak years at the club they choose to move to.

    I think all three have potential, but I think my preference would be Jerome, although it is difficult!
     
    #18

Share This Page