Just seen this http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/...blog/2013/may/06/anfield-liverpool-david-conn Quite a story. Thoughts?
If its right and no reason why not its pretty damn low. And this from a club who have faught for justice for the 96 and yet now seem to have been found out screwing over the local residents for their own gain.
To be fair to the current ownership, it sounds as though it goes way back. This sort of behaviour was common in the late twentieth century in all our major cities. I would be concerned by George Osborne's road building plans and the HS2 rail link equally as much as this news. The difference is we expect better of Liverpool FC.
