http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...st-offensive-terms-Liverpool-clamping-on.html I think there are two words they have missed out though
That's probably one of those things that they had to send to all staff to make out it was a general club policy, when really it was just meant for Suarez but they didn't want him to play the victim again.
Hi all. I have recently stumbled across this in the last few minutes and wanted to share it with you all. This is blinding but TOTALLY NSFW! How many of these words do you think are used on a regular basis at your work and more to the point, how often are they used at Liverpool? This should brighten up your afternoon! KTBFFH!
Following LFC's example, I'm afraid I'm going to have to ban you for the use of the abusive term "bugger" on the CFC forum. Can you imagine?
I read the other thread before I saw this one, good job I did as the newspaper did such a good job I couldn't work out half of the words on there
I used that once in a meeting but said 'well bugger me with a fish fork' luckily it got a lot of laughs as it was quite spontaneous.
Something for history to record, Liverpool FC becomes the Worlds first " Nanny " Football Club !! Whoops, " nanny" is on the list, sexist apparently, whoops " sexist" is also on the list, discriminatory , whoops " discriminatory" is on the list as well, too hard for them to spell , whoops, " hard" is on the list as well, too suggestive , whoops " on " is on the list, especially when used with "hard". Blimey, if they ban " history ", it will be quiet as a morgue in hub cap land.
