Also, I have clicked undecided although I think the current unrest is bad for the club. It can be a good thing but at the moment its not.
Josh the mods are never on these days, they tend to spend afternoons on waccoe Round about now Bucks is being thrown out of his local for chucking up on the punters, and Kissa is being arrested for pedeling porn Poor old Elland doesn't know what day it is .....
LUST is in principle a good idea, but as it stands at the moment it's like a pride of lions led by a donkey. As there's no category for 'would you like there to be a new Chairman of LUST?) I've voted bad
Undecided for me. I believe the Trust played a part in getting rid of a bad person and his cronies. I feel let down, but not sure that LUST is bad for the club and its fans.
The Portsmouth Supporters Trust saved Portsmouth F.C., and rid us of our last 'orrible foreign owner (Balram Chanrai) who was ruining the club. Without the PST, we would not have a club still - end of
Almost 50% have voted in favour of LUST, which means a lot of outside influence, but there are still a load of undecideds who if taken together with antiLUST voters would carry the day. But this is a democracy and LUST is ahead right now. I appreciate some of the comments from POmpey fans, but theres a big difference between the trusts. Yours was always around and doing the right thing, whereas ours started to have a go at Bates and then got involved in things that a trust shouldnt get involved. Our's was becoming the story and enjoying the limelight. They were commenting on things outside their remit as far as many are concerned and its even suggested that storys were made up so that they got into the media spotlight again.
In a normal election process you would apportion the don't knows approximately in line with the for and against. In other words a little over half to the for and the balance to the against camp. Hardly gives a balanced figure lumping all the undecided with the no camp. For the record, I don't give a **** but as people have gone to the bother of voting, we might as well analyse the figures correctly