Lee Jenkins v Dwight Tiendalli - Debate

Of all the players, why did Laudrup RE-sign this absolute 100% minge? Edit - He was bad enough first time.

I'm confident Garry Monk is well aware of Neil Taylor's abilities there after TeamGB. When Rangel is out Tayls should be straight in at RB.

 

[video=youtube;h0DukONKOag]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0DukONKOag[/video]

 

Can we sue him for bringing Tiendalli back if he's suing us?

 

Lee Jenkins left us 10years ago.

 

Triffic player.

 

Makes it difficult to debate then. But if we are talking about the players as they are now, I suppose I'd go for Tiendalli.

As a serious response to the OP, do you think, for the slightest moment, that Laudrup would have signed Tiendalli if he had had a quality option available? No, I didn't think so. Try asking Jenkins why he didn't provide the money for some better quality cover.

 

Jenkins could have had the mindset that as Jazz had covered that position previously then there was no need to buy another player .