leave her there

[DMD]

UK law is UK law, and the point we're discussing is the safeguarding of a British child.

Who is only at best part British, and born and living abroad. It just doesn't work how you'd like it to.

Broaden it out to the many others, and you'd end up draining much needed resources.

 

[Tel (they/them)]

Let hope that they never have any dealings or are affected in any such form as to change their views. Leave them in their safe space to watch Sky TV.

i'm calling bullshit on every single one of them. If any of them were ever affected by any terror attack of any kind, each and every single one of them would change their tune.

Let them deny that.

I can’t speak for anybody else, but regardless of whether it affects me personally or not these people denied folk of their basic human rights and as a bare minimum they should be stripped of theirs.

 

[DMD]

Let's see what happens first, her turning up or you winning the lottery. At least we know each other's position when she does

I'm not the one arguing from the position that she's already won it.

 

[Commachio]

You could go in there, we know you like playing at Rambo

Haha, whilst you sit looking at dodgy website to back the bygum slut up.

 

[Star of David Bardsley]

These ****s are unbelievable.

Just pointing out she’s not guilty of a crime as of yet, as Tel alluded to. We must have done this already.

 

[Star of David Bardsley]

Let hope that they never have any dealings or are affected in any such form as to change their views. Leave them in their safe space to watch Sky TV.

i'm calling bullshit on every single one of them. If any of them were ever affected by any terror attack of any kind, each and every single one of them would change their tune.

Let them deny that.

This is also a stupid argument as has been discussed before.

There’s a difference between what one would want as a victim or family of a victim and what is right by the law.

 

[Commachio]

This is also a stupid argument as has been discussed before.

There’s a difference between what one would want as a victim or family of a victim and what is right by the law.

Are you tasking the piss on purpose?

 

[Commachio]

Just pointing out she’s not guilty of a crime as of yet, as Tel alluded to. We must have done this already.

Just pointing out, she left home to join a terrorist group, in order to kill all us infadels./

I'm pretty sure there is a crime there.

 

[Treble]

Who is only at best part British, and born and living abroad. It just doesn't work how you'd like it to.

Broaden it out to the many others, and you'd end up draining much needed resources.

That's a fair point, it's not always practical but this isn't about how you or I would like it, but by the laws we abide by.

You can't pick and choose though. You express your worries about broadening out a less concerning problem of new-born babies and minors out there but fail to broaden out the long term problems of leaving the greater threat of hundreds, if not thousands of potential terrorists free to roam and cost us one way or another in many ways later on.

 

[Star of David Bardsley]

Are you tasking the piss on purpose?

There’s really no need for me to do so. I’ve got nothing against you but the “what would you do if it was your kids” argument is silly.

 

[brb]

Haha, whilst you sit looking at dodgy website to back the bygum slut up.

Nowt dodgy about my defence of the law. Thankfully we don't all make judgements down the barrel of a gun, while talking derogatory of women.

 

[Treble]

I'm not the one arguing from the position that she's already won it.

Neither am I. And even if I was, you do understand that's not the same as advocating for her.

I get the impression you see this as not only us vs them, but that anyone who holds a different opinion to you, must be with them.

 

[Star of David Bardsley]

Just pointing out, she left home to join a terrorist group, in order to kill all us infadels./

I'm pretty sure there is a crime there.

Maybe. Only one way to find out and it’s not mob consensus.

 

[DMD]

That's a fair point, it's not always practical but this isn't about how you or I would like it, but by the laws we abide by.

You can't pick and choose though. You express your worries about broadening out a less concerning problem of new-born babies and minors out there but fail to broaden out the long term problems of leaving the greater threat of hundreds, if not thousands of potential terrorists free to roam and cost us one way or another in many ways later on.

I mentioned your claim about the terrorist threat earlier, when I pointed out that she and the other Brits were radicalised here and the prisons are rife with it, which kind of dilutes your claim that we're safer bringing them back.

 

[DMD]

Neither am I. And even if I was, you do understand that's not the same as advocating for her.

You're expecting a lot of that one child that you're advocating for separation from it's mam and dad and arguably one or more of it's homelands, without knowing if that would be legal in reality. It may just end up a tad bitter your way.

 

[brb]

Just pointing out, she left home to join a terrorist group, in order to kill all us infadels./

I'm pretty sure there is a crime there.

You clearly have no comprehension of the law.

 

[Commachio]

Nowt dodgy about my defence of the law. Thankfully we don't all make judgements down the barrel of a gun, while talking derogatory of women.

thankfully who know **** all about the law, and have never touched a gun.

stick to what you do best mate.

 

[brb]

thankfully who know **** all about the law, and have never touched a gun.

stick to what you do best mate.

Firstly i have touched and fired a gun. Secondly i probably know a tad more about law than you

Stick to what you know best mate, hoying sausages.

 

[Treble]

I mentioned your claim about the terrorist threat earlier, when I pointed out that she and the other Brits were radicalised here and the prisons are rife with it, which kind of dilutes your claim that we're safer bringing them back.

Did you? All you posted was "Her being here initially hardly works well for your argument on the future threat there."

 

[DMD]

Did you? All you posted was "Her being here initially hardly works well for your argument on the future threat there."

In that one reply perhaps, but I've mentioned the other bits before. Either way, at least you get the point.