It might just be me, but looking through the fixtures on the City website, I can't believe the lazy and informal way that our fixtures have been written down The club have a fixture which is billed as Ashton & Backwell Utd away on 3rd July but further down it's a different story The 'Glasgow' is not present for the 'Rangers' fixture There is no 'City' after the words Bradford or Coventry No 'Town' after Shrewsbury or Swindon, and no 'United' after Peterborough Also no 'United' after Colchester, Rotherham or Carlisle and no 'Alexandra' after Crewe either. There is no 'Rovers' after Tranmere or 'Athletic' after Oldham, and no 'Borough' after Stevenage Wolverhampton Wanderers are billed as just Wolves Sheffield United are billed as Sheff Utd However, Milton Keynes Dons have their full title listed as do Leyton Orient, Preston North End, Notts County, Walsall, Port Vale and Crawley Town in our fixtures. Lazy lazy lazy !
You can usually tell how important a site is to a company by looking at the content. It's clear from looking at the Bristol City site that their online presence is an after-thought. It's a shame, because there are so many fantastic agencies/companies in Bristol making great websites. The Fantasy Premier League site was built in Bristol, as are many other sites in the same sector. However, even with the best website in the world, if those that maintain the content don't give a **** about it then the site will be ****.
