Why? He looked a decent player when we had him but like many who play in the central midfield he is not appreciated by our fans who expect them to have the combined skills og Glenn Hoddle and Brian Robson. His time with us was not helped by injuries but played his part in many games, when we beat Leeds at the KC he was outstanding but as usual it is the goalscorer who received all the post match attention. Since leaving us he has played in the Premiership and scored at that level including what turned out to be the winner at the KC:
If central midfielders at city don't score many, a few supporters think they're ****, they leave, and a few years later, they notice the said player is scoring cracking goals, then all of a sudden they turn and say "Why did we let him go?"
He's all right, he's never a Premier League player in a million years, but he's not a disaster either. I wouldn't particularly want him back, but we've had worse, anyone remember that useless twat called Bullard?
Me neither, I know it doesn't happen often but I think OLM must be wrong, you would have thought we'd have had at least one thread about him on here if he'd ever played for us.
he is at his level now. did very well at MK hence why paul ince took him to blackburn rovers. andrews will be better for ipswich than bullard. just wait and see.
Andrews is a much better signing for you, was a bit underrated during his time with us but always thought there was a good player in him, and he was captain of Wolves at a very early age.
