Just imagine you were the ref last Sunday. During the game, you end up being criticised by a large percentage of players, most using offensive language. Then, during the last 10 minutes, you are subjected to a torrent of abuse from 80% of the Chavski team,and the match ends. Remember that, the match is over. Then, in the privacy of your dressing room, a certain player, accompanied by others, hammers on the door, and uninvited, storms in an carried on with some pretty vile and abusive language. We have no idea what exactly was said, but I think the ref would be more than justified in telling that player, and his oppos to "f**k off!". The allegations of racist comments in my opinion are nonsense, as all of us know that this is unacceptable. But I do believe telling that player exactly where to go was more than justified. And if the Chelsea players think that is appropriate, then my granny's saying of " the pot calling the kettle black" comes into play. And for all you Chav's who jump uo in outrage, that is NOT a racist comment, but maybe your learned council at Chelsea might consider it justified as a racist court case. In fact, if I could claim a fee of 12 grand per hour as legal council, I would fight the case for you!.
I expect the Chavs to get hammered and maybe points deduction. It stinks off Bullshit from a few chav players
Instead of your usual nonsense Drogs, why not apply for the new post at Chelski as a PR officer with emphasis on race relations. Even someone as dense as you would be far better than the success rate of your predecessor.
"then my granny's saying of " the pot calling the kettle black" comes into play." That would be enough to get your granny an eight game ban by the FA (unless she's Rio).
I'm sure that would only happen if his granny denied saying anything, then admitted saying something during a heated argument that was apparently a term of endearment in her care home, then took part in a silly knitted T-shirt campaign followed by her statement being contradicted by the members of her very own bridge club.
Think you'll find the granny never once denied saying the word, despite there being no other evidence that she said anything at all; whereas the kettle changed its story three times about what, where, when and how many times the granny abused it after it secretly reviewed the evidence with the Kitchen Utensil Authorities.
Damn those dodgy people at the Kitchen Utensils Authority, it's hard to believe they didn't believe the nice old granny, I mean the statements that those friends at her bridge club made that contradicted her bus pass application must surely have just been a result of their senility due to old age.
No he just lied and said it was meant in a friendly way and that pinching someone on the arm is an attempt to diffuse the situation. As for changing stories well..... Its obvious dongahead never actually read the report.
Could be, as with the kettle's reason why it changed it story because it couldn't bear to repeat the word 'sooty', and was then seen on social networking sites whistling that very word.
Oh believe me, i've read the report and can instantly quote you a contradiction for every part of it. But the poster said the kettle denied using the word in the first place - never did (unlike Schmeical) and without his admission the KUA wouldn't have had a case in the first place.
That f**king ****** dingo is so obssessed with this subject that he needs to f**k off. Nobody can discuss any f**king thing without his f**king intervention and dragging the topic (any f**king topic) to low life rac1st Suarez
Go on then, quote a contradiction that proves Suarez was not unreliable. Prove his statements were backed up by the video evidence, prove he didn't change his story a number of times. Prove Evra's evidence was seriously undermined and not just mistaken on some minor thing. FYI something written on some Liverpool blog by someone who fancies himself an expert in legal issues or south American language is not proof. Either find it in the FA report or provide evidence of what the players actually said before the FA panel.
The dick should be banned form this board. Never offers anything constructive or new. But since he lives on here and brings Suarez into every thread I want to see him put up or shut up, hopefully the latter.
Don't invite him to play the victim again, it's bad enough watching him fumbling around with these granny and kettle comments.
Dingo was struggling there with his pathetic attempts at being funny The sooner that boring c*nt f*cks off the better
