#sillyseason On that basis had the Rat not scored the goals last season the RS would been relegated... And City would not have been champions in 2012 and 2014 without Aguero's goals... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...is-van-Gaal-s-bottom-half-Premier-League.html http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/fo...chez-would-be-14th-in-the-Premier-League.html
Agreed. Typically strikers score the goals, stupid to think that if you take your main striker out and replace them with another striker that you aren't going to get any goals (unless you're liverpool and bring in balotelli)
More silliness... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...lexis-Sanchez-Chelsea-didn-t-Diego-Costa.html More interesting, how many points did the RS GK lose for his team?
We all know that the press will come up with anything to sell papers, but those articles are really scraping the bottom of the barrel
Better question, can you tell us any team that would still have won the league if you took away their best goal scorers goals and related points in the last 10 years?
No one took them away. You sold Suarez and wasted the money on **** replacements and then Sturridge (the renowned crock) got himself crocked. Blame your incompetent manager.
If this, if that etc etc etc. I remember going to a football forum in the 80'w where Alan Hardaker was asked a question of Cardiff qualifying for Europe by winning the FA cup even before the draw was made. He had an answer that fits this thread too, and I quote "If your auntie had balls she would be your uncle.
Yes. Chelsea would still have won the league without Lampard's goals in 2005 Utd would still have won the league without Berbatov's goals in 2011 (although not without 'average, sulky, out of form' Rooney whose goals won us more points that year) Big clubs don't rely on a single player
