don't feed the hamelot troll.
I think that would be a very good argument, and you could make the same argument for Kobayashi although he was on a slightly different three-stop strategy. For whatever reason I think Button was too conservative in the early stage of each stint. I think Buemi and Kobayashi had the advantage of being unfettered and (to a degree, certainly a greater degree than Button) able to go for it at the beginning of each stint. Buemi did shorter stints than Button on his first two sets of options. Also, we're led to believe McLaren intended Button's stints to last even longer than they did so of course he would have been much more conservative than Buemi on his first two stints, which is when Buemi made up most of his places.Wrt to the topic, at the risk of offending Button supporters did anyone notice that Buemi, also on a 3 stop strategy finished 10 seconds behind Jenson,
You could argue that he made the strategy work better than Button did when you consider the speed per lap difference of those two cars
Buemi actually ran used options for his first three stints and then new primes for his last stint, same as Button. Kobayashi ran new primes followed by three sets of new options, according to Pirelli's tyre stop summary:Buemi and Koayashi would also of had fresh tyres which can be worth 5 or 6 seconds a stint.
Strategy was not wrong, Button was not quick enough or bold enough to overtake the cars he was stuck behind
Button chose the wrong strategy when he said "f*cking" out loud instead of tweeting and deleting it, like what Hamilton done.
Alex
Well reasoned response, passionate and emotive
Just one thing though
Lewis had a lengthy pitstop equivalent to an extra stop, and still spanked Jenson
Lewis' lap time were always quicker than Jensons after each stop
Button is a nice guy and obviously very handsome, however when it comes to F1 he couldn't make a 3 stop strategy work because his stints were not fast enough and he was not able to dispatch cars in front quickly when it mattered
Alex said:The Clear show that the strategy was wrong comes from comparing him to Lewis. Taking into account lewis was behind after the first stint the amount of time he gained (especially considering the abysmal pitstop) is staggering

Thats good. Try to pretend i'm ignoring the facts while yourself ignoring this.
![]()

Patronising... Really?In simple English easy to understand
I dont see how you linked that quote to his speed. He said he thought that the tyres could have lasted a few more laps. This does not mean that he should have gone faster. just pitted later in order to reduce the amount of laps and wear he suffered in his last stint.He could have gone faster and pitted at the same time, but would have suffered the same problems at the end of the race. Also if you want to use quotes from Jenson try this oneButton didn't think the strategy was wrong, he was unable to make it work, ultimately not fast enough, his excuse is that he was trying to look after the tyres expecting longer stints, but was brought in too early so he really should have gone faster
It is also worth noting that the timing of the stops is part of the strategy.Jenson Button said:the car felt very good but we just went the wrong way on strategy.
I will admit that i don't know enough about Buemi's race to comment. If you can show me how Buemi had similar traffic and Tyres (would he not have saved a set by going out in Q2?) then this is a good point.Buemi on identical strategy finished only 10 seconds behind him which was an example of making the strategy work extremely well
Do you think Button would not have accepted the strategy in the first place or would not have changed it if it was 'wrong'?
I'd like to see xiggly here, to be honest.Surely this has run its course. Please end it.