Just think, if fat parasites like you had done your job exposing Murray and Whyte we might not be where we are today. Prick.
Its not Scottish football that will collapse if sevco 5088 are admitted to the third division but the Tabloid press in Scotland. I'd say at least 60% of the DR readers are mainly reading for the news on Rangers (stupid buns), they have always pushed for that market. The next largest group (smart timmies) has already moved away from the written press and are far more comfortable with the 'internet bampots'.
It's true though ML. If the likes of Jabba had spent less time with their tongues up Murray's dunger and spent more time asking questions like "how can you afford these players?" or reporting bullshit about casinos then maybe Rangers might not have ended up in the state they did. It's their job to ask questions but they are guilty of a dereliction of duty.
That may be true, but whenever I see an article copy and pasted with brackets at the end of pretty much every paragraph, I know the person who posted it is beelin'. Traynor is a *****, but probably on the same level as all Scottish sport journos. They all pander to individual markets of idiots. Their job nowadays isn't so much as to ask questions, it's to generate controversy and discussion.
Do you think that, once the new season starts, Traynor will write some sort of public apology for his months of scaremongering and dity fat bastard tactics of pushing the panic button whenever he writes a new column? He's a waste of planetary matter.
"It's a mixture of settling old scores, blind hatred and downright malice". I assume he's talking about what New Rangers will have on their Club Badge?
Why do you obsess so much over people like Traynor and Alex Thomson? Are people not capable of independent thought?
No, most people are either not motivated or capable of having the level of intellectual thought or debate that (sometimes) exists on these types of forums. People are dumb ****wits that believe what they read in the tabloid press
Meh, I'm OK with that as long as it's critical/analytical - also, print articles are used as evidence in online arguments. My pet hate - my pet, pet, pet, pet, pet hate is people who comment on blogs/twitter with "well said" "Well said" basically means "You have confirmed my pre-existing view, or at least semi-justified it in a far more erudite manner than I ever could". ****in' well said