not sure what I think about this fella tbh He has been detained since 2002 without charge, which in itself is worrying and the whole innocent till proven guilty goes out of the window the current decision works more in his favour than against him I know he has a big beard etc etc however the case seems unsupported to a degree
detained WITHOUT charge so much for the whole debate on how many days you can be held without charge he is not the only one there is plenty more in places like belmarsh
yeah but at least that would actually be a charge at the moment he is in gaol, but why? nobody knows to accuse someone being very 'dangerous', surely a charge would be easy?
It's a rather radical suggestion but I do tend to agree. There must be some anti terror law to justify keeping him detained or are the authorities using the mental health act ?
Cant see that going down too well with kiddies some vile orrible posing as santa.. wouldnt do much for the image of M&S either.. Didnt we deport that chap with a hook for a hand? why cant we deport this ****er so he can have various parts of his body chopped off?? Though I'm all for publicly killing him only after a crack team of Super gays anally rape him whilst wearing plastic george bush masks on live tv...
If that act is real then Hadrians wall definately needs to be rebuilt My guess is he's a total looney window licking **** and as such has been detained under the mental health act
you obviously havent seen santa recently, they are all vile orrible things its not any santa, its m and s santa has a certain ring to it the hook guy hasnt been deported, has he been charged? that last sentence makes me believe you are a toby