1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Ipswich Bid for Sharp turned down!!

Discussion in 'Hull City' started by StrovolosTiger, May 13, 2011.

  1. StrovolosTiger

    StrovolosTiger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    6,507
    Likes Received:
    154
    £2.3m!! and £300k for Coppinger!!

    Blimey!! If they've got that kind of money to splash around they can damn well pay a bigger wack of Bullards wages if we decide to let him go there again!!

    Sharp and Coppinger
     
    #1
  2. originallambrettaman

    originallambrettaman Mod Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    111,649
    Likes Received:
    75,965
    I'm not sure that article's right, on the Ipswich boards they all seem to think it was a joint bid totalling £2.3m.

    You're right though, if they're splashing the cash and their number one target really is Jimmy, then with no fee the wage should balance itself out over the two years.
     
    #2
  3. Totally HCAFC

    Totally HCAFC Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    1,092
    Likes Received:
    2
    I like Billy Sharp, and would like him to sign here, but then again i think he wont fit the bill here, would he?
     
    #3
  4. YorkieLancsHampyLondoner

    YorkieLancsHampyLondoner Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Messages:
    11,531
    Likes Received:
    3,155
    It's wages that are the issue not a transfer fee.. with transfer fees you are able to sell the player on later.

    Paying Bullard's wages would cost us 45k x 52 = 2,340,000 every year! I think the total wage bill including the management staff is around £10m a year - so like Hull he would make up 25% of our entire wage bill.

    And since Jimmy is 32 we wouldn't be able to command any kind of fee in two or three years' time.

    We refused to match Charlie Austin's wage demands which led him to join Burnley instead of Town - Norris and McAuley are bound for the Premier League because again we wouldn't meet their wage demands. Unless you want to run the club into the ground you have to manage
    the finances sensibly, that's all. We do want Bullard but we're never going to pay more than £20k a week for him, which would in itself break our wage structure.
     
    #4
  5. Totally HCAFC

    Totally HCAFC Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    1,092
    Likes Received:
    2
    I think Jimmy will bring his wages down a tiny bit to go to Ipswich if he was that desperate.

    only one greedy b*****d, but a fantastic footballer. Exactly what we needed the last few games of the season!
     
    #5
  6. originallambrettaman

    originallambrettaman Mod Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    111,649
    Likes Received:
    75,965
    I'd say a £2m fee and £20k a week is about Jimmy's true worth.

    Give us a £2m fee and we'll use it to pay off Jimmy, so he agrees to a £20k a week deal with you. Piece of piss.
     
    #6
  7. John. Walkington.

    John. Walkington. Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Messages:
    3,798
    Likes Received:
    14
    Would definitely sort things out. It really does need sorting out quickly so we can move on.
     
    #7
  8. Boothferry2Wembley

    Boothferry2Wembley Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    1,725
    Likes Received:
    137
    Olm, I feel you are being very tongue in cheek with your comment here, why would the mighty tigers give JRB 2 million pounds when he is only seeking 1 (and a bit). If Ipswich Town are going to make an offer they should put it in writing as soon as possible in order that constructive talks may begin. Your comment on another thread that the parting needs to be as painless as possible was on the money as usual and in this case the less money the mighty tigers have to hand over, the less pain. For what it's worth, there are people close to Mr Bullard who are convinced he will be the midfield driving force for a major championship title contender next season. It looks like any hopes Ipswich fans have of their club obtaining Mr Bullards signature are rapidly fading and dying!
     
    #8
  9. originallambrettaman

    originallambrettaman Mod Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    111,649
    Likes Received:
    75,965
    What reason do you have for thinking he's only seeking one and a bit million?

    His contract is worth another £4.6m, if Ipswich pay him £20k a week, he's £2.5m out of pocket, I doubt he'd accept just half that as a settlement.
     
    #9
  10. Boothferry2Wembley

    Boothferry2Wembley Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    1,725
    Likes Received:
    137
    What makes you think he would accept 20 k a week from Ipswich?

    The logic for the figure mentioned is in the thread about mr Bullards golden good bye, you did reply to someone on that thread which dosn't mean to say you read it. But you could if you chose to.
     
    #10

  11. originallambrettaman

    originallambrettaman Mod Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    111,649
    Likes Received:
    75,965
    I have read that thread, that's why I asked what made you think he'd accept a pay off for far less than his contract entitles him to?

    I don't think for one minute he'll accept a pay-off that falls well over £1m short of what he'd get if he didn't move on. If he ends up getting about £4m of the £4.6m he'd get staying with us, then he may just accept it to secure the move to the club he wants to be at, anything above that I think he'll dismiss it out of hand.
     
    #11
  12. Amin Yapusi

    Amin Yapusi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    38,425
    Likes Received:
    19,777
    Also transfer fees are paid over time, they'd agree to pay us so much a month over the next couple of years, not the whole fee in one fell swoop. Wages have to be there and paid that very week (or month not sure how they do it) so even if they could afford a 2 odd million transfer fee and 20k a month, doesn't mean they will have 45k to cough up for him every week without running a massive debt via a bank loan if you can even get them any more with all this financial cutdown bollocks and banks going bust.
     
    #12
  13. Erik

    Erik Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    25,000
    Likes Received:
    3,060
    Definitely £2.6m for Coppinger and Sharp, £300k for JC and £2.3m for BS.

    That's for anyone who actually cares about the original purpose of this article.
     
    #13
  14. RicardoHCAFC

    RicardoHCAFC Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    10,311
    Likes Received:
    454
    If the transfer fee is paid over time, and so are wages then it makes no difference to Ipswich. The Allams have shown that if money is guaranteed in future they're prepared to put the capital in until it arrives. Ipswich agree to pay us £2M over 3 years, the Allams put in £2M now as a loan to pay off JB and take back the money as the payments come in. I don't even mind if they put a small interest rate on it to make themselves a little bit back that way (given it'll save the club a fortune if JB is off the wage bill)
     
    #14
  15. e18

    e18 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    475
    Likes Received:
    1
    Now there's an idea
     
    #15
  16. roaring tiger

    roaring tiger Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2011
    Messages:
    227
    Likes Received:
    2
    Thats a rubbish bid but they can have bullard for that amount!
     
    #16
  17. Amin Yapusi

    Amin Yapusi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    38,425
    Likes Received:
    19,777
    I actually meant that it's not that simple for Ipswich. Just because they can afford a 2.3 mil transfer fee doesn't mean they can afford 45k per week. I thought Ipswich were broke anyway??
     
    #17

Share This Page