A man who enticed, using every trick of the trade, two of our top players to MUFC now believes he has the right to accuse our chairman of bending the rules Berbatov and Carrick were enticed away using every media trick available and this double dyed knight of the realm must now suck on it
That's the thing about dictators, they never do wrong - because they say they aren't, and anyone who says they are tends to be shot.
He's coming out with some really strange statements at the moment, isn't he? It'd be interesting to see what kind of crap he'd say if West Ham were to beat them, but Big Sam's one of his disciples, so it's unlikely.
I reckon he'll leave at the end of the season. He's saying 2-3 years but when he announced it last time it ****ed up their season and given Mourinho looks set to leave at the end of the season it will be good timing.
Problem is Sky and Newscorp (all the United and Fergie sycophants) will defend him to the hilt to the point of sheer lunacy and indoctrinate the public to make the senile old fool seem rational. Sky sank to new lows last week when using one of their their correspondents to defend his comments re: Newcastle by using Sir Bobby Robson's death and claiming he was simply "Putting Pardew in his place". Incredulous really
I used to respect Fergie, I thought everything he had acheived was amazing. However now I cant help but think its time for him to dodder off and go home. He live out his days domestically abusing his wife for making his tea wrong, and conspiring with his dog how best to man mark the postman. I can honestly see him going off the boil, fergie was always a devious bell piece - but you kind of almost found his rants endearing. Now it seems more in the category of someone you see on the sad slope of senility. Hes two years from furiously shuffling one out at ladbrokes, and three from wetting himself in tescos whilst jabbering ****e. Its sad, honestly we should get a petition together to have him sectioned.
the FA should be investegating his lastest rant at the officals last week on the touchline,not a completly legal transfer
Ferguson obviously rates Fryers, why else would he be getting so wound up about a legitimate transfer. I genuinely believe Bacon Face is losing his marbles and should retire at the end of the season, either that or lay off the Scotch.
I've never respected Ferguson - there's never been any reason for me to do so, with his long list of excuses when they lose when he could be congratulating his opponents, the cynical tactics used on the pitch and in the transfer market, and him getting away with things that would see other managers banned for a few games.
If Fergie wants a certain player he just uses his usual channels of subversion. The player WILL know United want to sign him, he WILL know how much they'll pay too, and want out. Unavoidable and rarely if ever provable I mean, "they just showed up in a restaurant together by chance" When this kind of excuse is acceptable to explain away a secret planned meeting Fergie has accused Spurs of wrong doing, if there is none found he should be charged tbh
I don't think it is but I hope Fryers plays and scores the winner I agree with what you say though, he should be charged with bringing the game into disrepute after making allegations like that with no evidence.
indeed he should. Because he has no evidence. Even before anything is investigated if anything is, his calls for it are not enough for one, so if there is one you have to ask why? He made unfounded allegations, I say unfounded because all he has is his own opinion. He should be done for that anyways.
Spurs have pulled a fast one to sign Fryers on the cheap. How does attacking SAF detract from Spurs' conduct in this? About Carrick's move in 2006, the then Spurs' manager Jol said: "This is a move that Michael wants to make...". The move represented a massive profit for Spurs who signed Carrick for £2.75M two years previously. Ben Kingsley of fanzine "Cock-a-doodle-do" said: "The general view among Tottenham fans is that this is a good deal. I don't think fans will be desperately upset." Conversely, Mark Longden of IMUSA said : "I don't understand what is going on. I have not spoken to anyone who, when £18.6M became available, would have spent it on Michael Carrick." Ironically, the Carrick money was spent on Berbatov. Spurs seemed happy to sell Berbatov to Man City having complained about Utd allegedly tapping him up. When Utd bid £30M, Spurs were strangely keen to facilitate the move. Wenger, amongst others, commentated how Spurs had cynically used the complaint to negotiate a higher transfer fee. Berbatov was sold for far in excess of his market value at the time. So who's kidding who? Don't let the facts get in the way of a good rant.
No we haven't He's the one making the allegation as if he is whiter than white so? The price for Berbatov is neither here nore there, it was the timing that screwed us
