1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

How would you revamp the Champions League?

Discussion in 'Hull City' started by Gawge, Sep 14, 2011.

  1. Gawge

    Gawge Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2011
    Messages:
    1,286
    Likes Received:
    34
    The Champions League is meant to be Europe's elite competition, yet it is dull until February, we endure half a year of group stages when there is hardly ever an upset anyway.

    How would you make the competition more entertaining?

    Personally, I would start with two seeded knock-out rounds (2 legs) and get it down to 8 teams. There is the chance of upsets, there would be good games in that lot, especially in the second round. Then, you split the 8 teams into two groups of 4, you might get something looking like this:

    Group A: Barcelona, Man Utd, Bayern Munich, AC Milan
    Group B: Real Madrid, Chelsea, Inter Milan, Man City

    How great would that be? Every game is top quality European elite football, exactly what the Champions League should be. The winner of each group plays the runner-up of the opposite group for the semi-finals, and the competition stays the same from then on.
     
    #1
  2. HullTigerSteve

    HullTigerSteve Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    921
    Likes Received:
    38
    Back to champions only - hence the name champions league. Just a knockout, never mind seeding teams .
     
    #2
  3. bum_chinned_crab

    bum_chinned_crab Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    21,807
    Likes Received:
    6,317
    Make it a straight draw. There is no sporting justification - only a commercial one - to ensure teams from the same country dont play each other in the group stage.

    It should only be a maximum 3 teams from one country also. I know you and others suggest getting in the 'big names' but for me it would be far mroe interesting to have more representatives from other nations in there. Platini gets a lot of stick but encouraging perceived smaller league representation would be far more interesting and I like that he is addressing this.
     
    #3
  4. Harap

    Harap Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    861
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think current format is fine but scrap the seedings. There's no chance they'd do it though, they want the biggest 16 sides through to the knock outs
     
    #4
  5. StrovolosTiger

    StrovolosTiger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    6,507
    Likes Received:
    154
    It's a creeping Euro League. It's all about money.

    To win the Champions League today is far less of an achievement than it was to win the European Cup back in the 80's.
     
    #5
  6. BernsteinTiger

    BernsteinTiger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    1,433
    Likes Received:
    256
    And in one fell swoop you solve the problem of teams taking the cups seriously... 3 teams entered, and we have three cups. Only Champions get in, runners up in the leagues and cups then get Europa League entry...

    The money says it won't happen - but by god it would make the Leagues and cups interesting!
     
    #6
  7. x

    x Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2011
    Messages:
    9,161
    Likes Received:
    3,339
    they should just make if for teams that are their country's champions rather than not. it should be knockout from start to finish. it should be renamed the european cup. sepp blatter should be executed by being forcefed cane toads.

    this is all true.
     
    #7
  8. originallambrettaman

    originallambrettaman Mod Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    111,752
    Likes Received:
    76,289
    I don't think there's any problem with it as it is, it's by far the best cup competition in the world and the four places we get have a very positive effect on the battle at the end of the Premier League season.
     
    #8

Share This Page