what a poor and biased round up of our game , match of the day is **** and **** of shearer and all!! well done the lads today much much improved ..shame wasnt mentioned !
Typical. All about Chelsea failing to win two pens and the handshake thing. Not one mention of us and the performance.
yes i thought that , just after our recent dross weve been playing that was different side out there today erned a draw to the (champions of europe apparently ) thought they looked average ... not one word , does the bbc have a problem with us or something i would have thought us being there local club they might at least make a little effort , cant remeber last time chesea were on second last either?
And Granero/Faurlin didn't get a single mention. Absolute ****ing disgrace that programme. I'm truly shocked at the biased coverage
The Terry one was never a pen. Honestly though, the SWP one was. Still, never got a mention from the experts.
Don't they broadcast from Salford now? They only care about the "big boys" Can't remember the last time I watched MOTD give me Football First match choice every week
It was like that last season as well remember our game against man city at home how well we played and took the game to them.......... But oh no motd gave all credit to city and David Silva on how good they were. program pi**es me off i very rarely watch it now.
Noticed that and agree. Same to be honest with Norwich. Battled it out 50/50 with Wet Spam, yet it's us who'll be having the tough season. Shearer should be neutered. (I'll do it, if necessary)
Surely as a TV sports producer you would at first understand and realise that fans of every team will be tuning in. So you would therefore make sure that your pundits would be made to mention (even if it's negative) something related to your team. Not just ghost over it as if the fan had not experienced 90 mins of an occasion that you have just covered. The BBC sports coverage has been poor for a while and I really don't see the point of the pundits as they offer no real in-depth analysis to any event really. They just gloss over the superficial items that are there for all to see and understand without giving us any unique insightfulness.
this true why bother saying anything if its just obvious anyway , and yes the producers are very lazy clearly, they are on serious dough as well what a piss take , they just couldnt be ****ed , disgrace really propper pissed me off ..
We've all seen incidents such as both penalty shouts given in the past and, on that basis, should consider the Rs fortunate today. As for the coverage, I don't understand why all the outrage and surprise. It has always been thus. The 'top teams' are never matched or outplayed - they turn in a below par performance. The media believe their stars are household names, so incident involving them must be dissected and examined. To get the good publicity of a Swansea, you have to win friends first. Yeah, it's a jaundiced view, but I've had such a **** couple of weeks, I frankly couldn't give a toss if Lineker spurned Nelsen's advances and gave Terry a blowjob instead.
MOTD is always quite shocking but can't believe they never picked up on the pass by Hazard in the second half where is he twisted and used the wrong foot - there is a trendy name for this type of pass but I can't remember it!
At least if Spurs beat us we can look forward to being on first or second I like Hansen but Shearer is a tosser
The big clubs will always get coverage in their favour. For every one QPR, Norwich, Stoke etc. fan not at the game there will be fifty United, Liverpool, Chelsea sitting at home in a tight replica top waiting for their football fix so they can chat football with their work colleagues who don't like them.
You think MOTD was bad! You should have watched the US stream on Fox! They clearly love Chelsea and said we had been shopping in a Flea Market over the summer, buying players that had been rejected by Chelsea...(load of bollox) now I know we don't watch Fox normally, but what a picture this paints to any potential US audience.
MOTD has gone "tablioid". They are more interested in the "controversial" and the salacious than the football played on the pitch. I remember the days of MOTD or The Big Match where Jimmy Hill or Brian Moore made a few observations. End of. Then we got on with the match. We are not all so thick that we need Hansen or Shearer to tell us what a good shot or good tackle is, we don't need Neville to tell us that a striker covered 24% of the penalty area or touched his balls 14 times during a game and we don't need Big Ears to tell us which crisps to buy. Same goes for radio. I sometimes watch a match whilst listening to radio 5. There are many occassions when I am watching play on the screen and have to listen to Alan Green prattle on with his own opinion about something else entirely as if the match has paused. We also do not need 45 minutes or an hour "build up" to televised matches. Frankly we are paying large sums of money to egocentric twats to talk patronising gibberish when we could be watching something good - like drying paint. That's all. Thank you.
MOTD is crap because it has to cram so much in and analysis is limited and the 'talking heads' have to be a little controversial The only suprise is that you're suprised! BTW I thought RdM was gracious in his post match interview saying anything from Loftus Road is a bonus
