1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

hazard to receive no further punishment

Discussion in 'Chelsea' started by Bodinki, Jan 31, 2013.

  1. Bodinki

    Bodinki You're welcome
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2011
    Messages:
    27,864
    Likes Received:
    15,543
    While the last thing I want to do is bring this up again,
    The FA have just ruled that Hazards 3 game ban for his red card against Swansea in the Capitol One Cup semi final is adequate punishment and have decided not to increase the ban
     
    #1
    Bodinki, Jan 31, 2013
  2. shwan

    shwan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2012
    Messages:
    4,648
    Likes Received:
    126
    good news .. so he can play against City
     
    #2
    shwan, Jan 31, 2013
  3. ChelseaCOE2012

    ChelseaCOE2012 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2012
    Messages:
    2,915
    Likes Received:
    1,240
    Good, FA saved themselves from embarassment for once
     
    #3
    ChelseaCOE2012, Jan 31, 2013
  4. luckywerthers

    luckywerthers Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    Messages:
    1,221
    Likes Received:
    20
    one bit of good news
     
    #4
    luckywerthers, Jan 31, 2013
  5. CFC: Champs £launderx17

    CFC: Champs £launderx17 Captain Ahab

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2012
    Messages:
    19,665
    Likes Received:
    3,345
    Quite right. He kicks who he wants, he kicks who he wants... Eden hazard, he kicks who he wants
     
    #5
    CFC: Champs £launderx17, Jan 31, 2013
  6. bluemoon2

    bluemoon2 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2011
    Messages:
    4,677
    Likes Received:
    105
    Great news! He's back for the Brentford replay then! An opportunity to for some poetic justice !!!
     
    #6
    bluemoon2, Jan 31, 2013
  7. Chelsea Pensioner

    Chelsea Pensioner Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    6,400
    Likes Received:
    1,391
    Apparently it wasn't an FA decision, but an Independent Commission who accepted Chelseas' case. The FA wouldn't have enough brains between them to come up with a sensible decision.
     
    #7
    Chelsea Pensioner, Jan 31, 2013
  8. BelugaWhale

    BelugaWhale Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2012
    Messages:
    468
    Likes Received:
    7
    at last - some sanity - so it clearly wasn't "clearly insufficient" <ok>
     
    #8
    BelugaWhale, Jan 31, 2013

Share This Page