http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11675/7287236/Livermore-stay-cost-Spurs
Report says that 'Arry chose to pay an "inflated" fee for Parker rather than paying a smaller amount + Livermore on loan. All I can say is that's been a great decision for a couple of reasons.
1. Parker has been worth whatever we paid and more since signing.
2. Livermore has proved he's more than capable filling in when needed and has become an important squad member over the past couple of months. Had we loaned him at the time, we'd have been f*cked for some of the games this season.
Report says that 'Arry chose to pay an "inflated" fee for Parker rather than paying a smaller amount + Livermore on loan. All I can say is that's been a great decision for a couple of reasons.
1. Parker has been worth whatever we paid and more since signing.
2. Livermore has proved he's more than capable filling in when needed and has become an important squad member over the past couple of months. Had we loaned him at the time, we'd have been f*cked for some of the games this season.
