You can't convince a believer of anything, for their belief is not based on evidence, it's based on a deep seated need to believe.
According to the falsification principle put forward by Flew in the 1950s, religious believers never allow for any evidence to count against their beliefs, therefore discussion on it is inherently meaningless. However, this can be applied to atheists as well, you could argue that the amount of evidence given for God is so great in scripture, religious experiences etc. is more than enough to prove His existence, they are blinded by their necessity to disprove the existence of God.
man written scripture, religous experiences which are clearly created in the mind thats a real ton of evidence
Depends on the way you look at it. If you're too sceptical you'll end up believing nothing outside you own brain exists. Too faithful and you'll believe anything you're told. I've had a religious experience myself, there are plenty of people cured from deadly diseases and illnesses overnight, but if you don't want these things to count against your deep beliefs, that's fine.
In what way? There are documented cases where somebody with an incurable disease is miraculously cured, for no apparent reason. Take it as you will, be it some sort of a God or just sheer coincidence.
You mean spontaneous remission? It happens relatively infrequently, but it's not so rare to be attributed to magic. Anyone ever regrown any limbs?
