It seems since our mate @Skylarker has become matthews manager, his personality is slowly morphing into a weymouth matthew.
I ain't got **** on Matth, Holmes.
It seems since our mate @Skylarker has become matthews manager, his personality is slowly morphing into a weymouth matthew.
It seems since our mate @Skylarker has become matthews manager, his personality is slowly morphing into a weymouth matthew.

TL DR
I'm chief, I have to resort to childish insults in the hope that it validates my argument but, at the same time, I also admit that what Big Ern said is essentially correct, we'd had no money or success ufor 25+years until we went to the City for money, just after we let Micheal Knoighton do some keepie uppies and offered us £30m he didn't have.
And you have the temerity to call me thick, what a ****er
I said you broke transfer records AFTER you went to the City with your begging bowl, not before. It's you that is contradicting yourself by stating you didn;t go to the City to get money to buy success, which you are now saying is exactly what you did do.No money yet continually broke transfer records?
Make your mind up.
If becoming a plc is begging the city for money then yes, you are 'essentially' correct.
Like all those plc's the country over, begging for money.

considering only one of those was a transfer record, yes, you did inmagine it, were you supporting a more successful team back then and your memory is hazy? Maybe you should research things a bit more before you post, for example Davenport cost £750,000 in 1986, which is half what you paid for Robson n '81, 5 years earlierNo one cares what you said, it's ****ing irrelevant, that fact is we did
break transfer records before
Bryan Robson? Gary Birtles? Peter Davenport? Did I imagine them?
But yeah, we needed the money and begged the city and that's, like, what really happened.
In Liverpool and City's shadow?![]()
Yeah can you imagine United fans saying something similar?
Spot on.You’ve got your Kopite specs on again mate.
Barkley would have missed an open goal from 3 yards lol, whatever you say.
Chelsea looked slick on the ball, but they just couldn’t break through and were forced to work the ball wide and swing it into the box, which Newcastle were happy with. That game was all about one side not being interested in an actual game of football.
Certainly was.Before he tells you himself, they’re not mate. RS GD is better.
Bitterness was behind it though![]()

Shut it shorty!Chelsea were ****ing ****. Newcastle even worse.
considering only one of those was a transfer record, yes, you did inmagine it, were you supporting a more successful team back then and your memory is hazy? Maybe you should research things a bit more before you post, for example Davenport cost £750,000 in 1986, which is half what you paid for Robson n '81, 5 years earlier
And, since you've already admitted I was right, there's nothing more to say other than
You thick twat.

He has a problem with you United for some sad reason, no idea why. Probably got picked on when he was a fat little kid lolWe're talking about the original flotation.
Erm claims we were 'given' foreign money, which subsequently meant we bought the league for 20 years.
We were skint before that apparently.
His fantasy is bollocks but why let actual facts get in the way of a good story, it's Ern after all.
He does sound quite angry about United tbf.He has a problem with you United for some sad reason, no idea why. Probably got picked on when he was a fat little kid lol
I read about that. Apparently the owner is taking over. What a ****.Billericay Town were promoted to the Conference (National) South this season. They won four and drew one of their first five games. On Saturday they lost for the first time this season. The manager was sacked five minutes before FT.
I read about that. Apparently the owner is taking over. What a ****.