1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

For Toby re Global warming

Discussion in 'General Chat' started by thefanwithnoname, Jul 6, 2011.

  1. thefanwithnoname

    thefanwithnoname Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    15,399
    Likes Received:
    2,952
    Thought you m ight appreciate this re our last discussion.
    Point being that the earth has gone through similar processes before

    Not to say we are not MAYBE speeding it up with certain things but it may have been inevitable anyway

    A summary of the sequence of events for the last 130,000 years ('real' years);




    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    150,000 y.a. - cold, dry full glacial world

    around 130,000 y.a. - rapid warming initiates the Eemian interglacial (Stage 5e)

    130,000-110,000 y.a. - global climates generally warmer and moister than present, but with progressive cooling to temperatures more similar to present.

    (except for possible global cold, dry event at 121,000 y.a.)

    ?110,000 y.a. - a strong cooling marks the end of the Eemian interglacial (Stage 5e).

    105,000-95,000 y.a. - climate warms slightly but still cooler and drier than present; strong fluctuations.

    95,000 - 93,000 y.a. - another cooler phase similar to that at 110,000 y.a.

    93,000 - 75,000 y.a. - a milder phase, resembling that at 105,000-95,000 y.a.

    75,000 - 60,000 y.a. - full glacial world, cold and dry (the 'Lower Pleniglacial' or Stage 4)

    60,000 - 25,000 y.a. - 'middling phase' of highly unstable but generally cooler and drier-than-present conditions (Stage 3)

    25,000 - 15,000 y.a. - full glacial world, cold and dry; Stage 2 (includes the 'Last Glacial Maximum')

    (This period includes two 'coldest phases' - Heinrich Events - at around 23,000-21,000 y.a. and at 17,000-14,500 y.a.)

    14,500 y.a. - rapid warming and moistening of climates in some areas. Rapid deglaciation begins.

    13,500 y.a. - nearly all areas with climates at least as warm and moist as today's

    12,800 y.a. (+/- 200 years)- rapid onset of cool, dry Younger Dryas in many areas

    11,500 y.a. (+/- 200 years) - Younger Dryas ends suddenly, back to warmth and moist climates (Holocene, or Stage 1)

    9,000 y.a. - 8,200 y.a. - climates warmer and often moister than today's

    about 8,200 y.a. - sudden cool and dry phase in many areas

    8,000-4,500 y.a. - climates somewhat warmer and moister than today's

    Since 4,500 y.a. - climates fairly similar to the present

    (except; about 2600 y.a. - relatively wet/cold event (of unknown duration) in many areas)
     
    #1
  2. The Raging Oxter

    The Raging Oxter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2010
    Messages:
    31,025
    Likes Received:
    4,561
    And your point?
     
    #2
  3. thefanwithnoname

    thefanwithnoname Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    15,399
    Likes Received:
    2,952
    so Tina is Mick
    and
    ST is Toby
     
    #3
  4. Leon Bessi

    Leon Bessi Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    6,471
    Likes Received:
    16
    its a myth 0.0
     
    #4
  5. monacoger

    monacoger POTY 2021

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2010
    Messages:
    63,434
    Likes Received:
    49,021
    Of course its a cycle, just adapt and overcome.
     
    #5
  6. The Raging Oxter

    The Raging Oxter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2010
    Messages:
    31,025
    Likes Received:
    4,561
    Ah, you're a climate scientist then.
     
    #6
  7. thefanwithnoname

    thefanwithnoname Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    15,399
    Likes Received:
    2,952
    not saying its a complete myth

    as some bloke said

    nature is an angry beast and we may be poking a stick at it

    It has happened before though and there were no humans around
     
    #7
  8. The Raging Oxter

    The Raging Oxter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2010
    Messages:
    31,025
    Likes Received:
    4,561
    Climate change is cyclicial but that doesn't mean what's happening now is natural or that it isn't being speeded up by human activity.

    Dying is natural but you can speed up the process by smoking, drinking and eating fast food every day <ok>
     
    #8
  9. Toby

    Toby GC's Life Coach

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    36,100
    Likes Received:
    20,979
    A common skeptic argument is that climate has changed naturally in the past, long before SUVs and coal-fired power plants, so therefore humans cannot be causing global warming now. Interestingly, the peer-reviewed research into past climate change comes to the opposite conclusion. To understand this, first you have to ask why climate has changed in the past. It doesn't happen by magic. Climate changes when it&#8217;s forced to change. When our planet suffers an energy imbalance and gains or loses heat, global temperature changes.

    There are a number of different forces which can influence the Earth&#8217;s climate. When the sun gets brighter, the planet receives more energy and warms. When volcanoes erupt, they emit particles into the atmosphere which reflect sunlight, and the planet cools. When there are more greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, the planet warms. These effects are referred to as external forcings because by changing the planet's energy balance, they force climate to change.

    It is obviously true that past climate change was caused by natural forcings. However, to argue that this means we can&#8217;t cause climate change is like arguing that humans can&#8217;t start bushfires because in the past they&#8217;ve happened naturally. Greenhouse gas increases have caused climate change many times in Earth&#8217;s history, and we are now adding greenhouse gases to the atmosphere at a increasingly rapid rate.
    Looking at the past gives us insight into how our climate responds to external forcings. Using ice cores, for instance, we can work out the degree of past temperature change, the level of solar activity, and the amount of greenhouse gases and volcanic dust in the atmosphere. From this, we can determine how temperature has changed due to past energy imbalances. What we have found, looking at many different periods and timescales in Earth's history, is that when the Earth gains heat, positive feedbacks amplify the warming. This is why we've experienced such dramatic changes in temperature in the past. Our climate is highly sensitive to changes in heat. We can even quantify this: when you include positive feedbacks, a doubling of CO2 causes a warming of around 3°C.

    What does that mean for today? Rising greenhouse gas levels are an external forcing, which has caused climate changes many times in Earth's history. They're causing an energy imbalance and the planet is building up heat. From Earth's history, we know that positive feedbacks will amplify the greenhouse warming. So past climate change doesn't tell us that humans can't influence climate; on the contrary, it tells us that climate is highly sensitive to the greenhouse warming we're now causing.
     
    #9
  10. The Raging Oxter

    The Raging Oxter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2010
    Messages:
    31,025
    Likes Received:
    4,561
    Aaaaaarrrrrrrgggggggghhhhhhhhhh!!!!

    please log in to view this image
     
    #10

  11. Leon Bessi

    Leon Bessi Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    6,471
    Likes Received:
    16
    ive seen a few movies on the theory, the day after tomorrow, independence day, sunshine , 10,000 bc and aliens so I think I know a little on the subject.
     
    #11
  12. monacoger

    monacoger POTY 2021

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2010
    Messages:
    63,434
    Likes Received:
    49,021
    Adapt and overfuckingcome, who gives a ****.
     
    #12
  13. thefanwithnoname

    thefanwithnoname Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    15,399
    Likes Received:
    2,952
    its more than being skeptical as it has occurred in the past over and that is proven

    The only consistent pattern being its occurrence, time periods being inconsistent

    Its been 13000 years (approx) since the last 'ice age' (its technically not an ice age) so there is no evidence to suggest its not a natural cycle

    There is a theory that greenhouse gasses created by humans can/have sped this up, but time has shown these some of these theories fall by the wayside

    as quoted before

    Nature is angry and we MAY be poking it with a stick
     
    #13
  14. The Raging Oxter

    The Raging Oxter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2010
    Messages:
    31,025
    Likes Received:
    4,561
    What? How has time shown that? Do you have a time travel machine?
     
    #14
  15. thefanwithnoname

    thefanwithnoname Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    15,399
    Likes Received:
    2,952
    Over the past several decades, rising concentrations of greenhouse gases have been detected in the Earth's atmosphere. Although there is not universal agreement within the scientific community on the impacts of increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases, it has been theorized that they may lead to an increase in the average temperature of the Earth's surface. To date, it has been difficult to note such an increase conclusively because of the differences in temperature around the Earth and throughout the year, and because of the difficulty of distinguishing permanent temperature changes from the normal fluctuations of the Earth's climate. In addition, there is not universal agreement among scientists and climatologists on the potential impacts of an increase in the average temperature of the Earth, although it has been hypothesized that it could lead to a variety of changes in the global climate, sea level, agricultural patterns, and ecosystems that could be, on net, detrimental.

    The most recent report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concluded that: &#8220;Our ability to quantify the human influence on global climate is currently limited because the expected signal is still emerging from the noise of natural variability, and because there are uncertainties in key factors. These include the magnitudes and patterns of long-term variability and the time-evolving pattern of forcing by, and response to, changes in concentrations of greenhouse gases and aerosols, and land surface changes. Nevertheless, the balance of evidence suggests that there is a discernable human influence on global climate
     
    #15
  16. Toby

    Toby GC's Life Coach

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    36,100
    Likes Received:
    20,979
    Thefanwithnoname I would love to argue about this, it's one of my favourite subjects. Let me do some work first, I'll be back in a bit to share some of my wisdom <ok>
     
    #16
  17. thefanwithnoname

    thefanwithnoname Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    15,399
    Likes Received:
    2,952
    because the havent happened

    go back to the 80's when we were going to have scorching winters etc etc etc

    You dont need a time machine you lived through it

    I do accept you may have been too drunk/drugged to notice
     
    #17
  18. Denny Kalglish

    Joined:
    May 6, 2011
    Messages:
    833
    Likes Received:
    13
    The effect of climate change is happenening all around us RIGHT NOW! It's just awful!

    I have to stumble around in semi-darkness due to **** lightbulbs!
    I have to put my paper in one bin, my glass in another, food in the compost - FFS I want to throw it away not file it!
    And to make matters worse, gone is the simple pleasure of dumping a fridge in a canal
     
    #18
  19. thefanwithnoname

    thefanwithnoname Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    15,399
    Likes Received:
    2,952
    Mine too. Hence the effort of posting it

    As long as you realise that it isnt about 'mines bigger than yours' or '**** off i believe this so blah blah blah'

    I genuinely like looking into/discussing things. Often playing devils advocate

    <ok>

    look forward to the 'wisdom' <ok>
     
    #19
  20. The Raging Oxter

    The Raging Oxter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2010
    Messages:
    31,025
    Likes Received:
    4,561
    Right, this is getting ridiculous.

    because the havent happened - Becuse what hasn't happened?

    Scorching winters? Where? Who said that? And you do understand that localised weather has nothing to do with climate don't you?

    You dont need a time machine you lived through it - are you trying to be funny?

    I do accept you may have been too drunk/drugged to notice - I wasn't old enough to do further education in the 80s (despite what EDGE may claim) but I was old enough to do a degree in Environmental Biology in the 90s.
     
    #20

Share This Page