For and Against

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
well i am going to suggest that hernandez should of been sent off which people forget as well ..


all square what yous recon
 
A less tolerant referee would have booked Hernandez for the foul.
As already booked, he should have been sent off IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RobEllious
Heed said:
A less tolerant referee would have booked Hernandez for the foul.
As already booked, he should have been sent off IMO.
Click to expand...
I pondered this, or is it a case of reputation and position causing bias with refs?
We now have Kane and Hernandez, two players you wouldn't normally expect even a yellow for, both escaping a clear second yellow to the red.
Certain most defenders would have seen red over those fouls
 
RobEllious said:
I pondered this, or is it a case of reputation and position causing bias with refs?
We now have Kane and Hernandez, two players you wouldn't normally expect even a yellow for, both escaping a clear second yellow to the red.
Certain most defenders would have seen red over those fouls
Click to expand...

I don't know, ref at the weekends Bournemouth v ManCity game, should have sent off Steve Cook for assault, and didn't book him. Nathan Ake, should have gone, but he bottled that one as well.
 
You lot are starting to sound like those players who wave the imaginary cards at the referees.
 
So does the Ritchie decision count as one for?

Not sent off for a high foot. Would you say he should have been sent off. Rules probably say he should have been but was it really a sending off offence? Not for me.
 
I am Groot said:
So does the Ritchie decision count as one for?

Not sent off for a high foot. Would you say he should have been sent off. Rules probably say he should have been but was it really a sending off offence? Not for me.
Click to expand...

Everyones measuring it against the Mane tackle when nobody even cared about the high foot on Mbemba at Hudds, far worse in my opinion. Double standards and all that ****e. Not a red to me
 
andre marriner the ref today ( lets see if his fat arse can keep up with play ).. something is going to happen ...
 
well well well .. mr marriner missed a big push by that bauldy **** on mbemba for there goal ..also missed a red ... never fails whats you recon guys
 
leez said:
well well well .. mr marriner missed a big push by that bauldy **** on mbemba for there goal ..also missed a red ... never fails whats you recon guys
Click to expand...
I only saw it live, but I don't think Mbemba was anywhere near the lad that put it back across or was running in his direction. Nor was he going to get across to stop the cross or shot. I don't think it affected anything.

I do think their forward stamped deliberately, however, and should get a retrospective ban but again it made no difference to the result.
 
Not a ****in mention of the stamp on Yedlin on match of the day 2

Selective re-reffing of the game again
Had it been Shelvey or Mitro ....
Well we have seen what happens to our guys
 
  • Like
Reactions: leez
i recon 1 nil against ...
Rafa said it we dont get ( the block ) which i also agree.


whats yous reconn it was a game or score changing moment
 
leez said:
i recon 1 nil against ...
Rafa said it we dont get ( the block ) which i also agree.


whats yous reconn it was a game or score changing moment
Click to expand...
I reckon we may look back on that incident and see it as the moment that the Premier League title was lost. Mr Mariner should have his bollocks coated in honey and placed over the top of an ants nest.
 
I had no problem with any of the decisions yesterday. I didn't think the forward trod on Perez deliberately either, and there was no big hullabaloo. It did look worse slowed down but nothing really.

Generally the referee had a very low impact on the game, which generally means he had a good one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back